Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ASHR vs MCHS
ASHR vs MCHS Comparison
Open Charts ASHR vs MCHS
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A ETF
Price$28.80
Change+$0.27 (+0.95%)
Volume$4.28M
Net Assets2B
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Price$31.23
Change+$1.89 (+6.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.5M
ASHR vs MCHS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ASHR vs. MCHS commentary
Jul 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASHR is a Buy and MCHS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASHR has more net assets: 2B vs. MCHS (2.5M). MCHS has a higher annual dividend yield than ASHR: MCHS (15.191) vs ASHR (8.802). ASHR was incepted earlier than MCHS: ASHR (12 years) vs MCHS (2 years). ASHR (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than MCHS (0.89). MCHS has a higher turnover ASHR (50.00) vs ASHR (50.00).
| ASHR | MCHS | ASHR / MCHS | |
| Gain YTD | 8.802 | 15.191 | 58% |
| Net Assets | 2B | 2.5M | 79,800% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.89 | 73% |
| Turnover | 50.00 | 115.31 | 43% |
| Yield | 1.09 | 4.86 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ASHR | MCHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 6 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 82% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PPIE | 26.45 | 0.20 | +0.78% |
| Putnam PanAgora ESG Intl Eq ETF | |||
| KBUF | 31.28 | 0.10 | +0.32% |
| KraneShares 90% KWEB Dfnd Outcm Jan27ETF | |||
| NFEB | 26.30 | 0.07 | +0.28% |
| Innovator Growth-100 Pwr Buffr ETF - Feb | |||
| FLDR | 50.19 | 0.05 | +0.10% |
| Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF | |||
| PQDI | 19.31 | -0.01 | -0.05% |
| Principal Spectrum Tax-Adv Dvd Actv ETF | |||
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | N/A | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.63% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.06% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.59% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.43% |