Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ASHR vs MCHS
ASHR vs MCHS Comparison
Open Charts ASHR vs MCHS
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A ETF
Price$33.49
Change+$0.25 (+0.75%)
Volume$177.78K
Net Assets1.79B
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Price$36.01
Change-$0.63 (-1.72%)
Volume$150
Net Assets2.93M
ASHR vs MCHS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ASHR vs. MCHS commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASHR is a Hold and MCHS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASHR has more net assets: 1.79B vs. MCHS (2.93M). MCHS has a higher annual dividend yield than ASHR: MCHS (9.392) vs ASHR (1.187). ASHR was incepted earlier than MCHS: ASHR (12 years) vs MCHS (2 years). ASHR (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than MCHS (0.89). ASHR has a higher turnover MCHS (115.31) vs MCHS (115.31).
| ASHR | MCHS | ASHR / MCHS | |
| Gain YTD | 1.187 | 9.392 | 13% |
| Net Assets | 1.79B | 2.93M | 61,134% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.89 | 73% |
| Turnover | 143.00 | 115.31 | 124% |
| Yield | 2.26 | 3.21 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ASHR | MCHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 7 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 75% | 14 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | N/A | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 37% Loosely correlated | -3.19% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 32% Poorly correlated | -3.09% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.20% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.58% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 17% Poorly correlated | -1.02% |