Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ASHR vs MCHS
ASHR vs MCHS Comparison
Open Charts ASHR vs MCHS
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A ETF
Price$31.58
Change+$0.71 (+2.30%)
Volume$12.5M
Net Assets2.32B
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Price$33.00
Change+$0.65 (+2.01%)
Volume$202
Net Assets2.59M
ASHR vs MCHS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ASHR vs. MCHS commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASHR is a StrongBuy and MCHS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASHR has more net assets: 2.32B vs. MCHS (2.59M). MCHS has a higher annual dividend yield than ASHR: MCHS (29.548) vs ASHR (19.305). ASHR was incepted earlier than MCHS: ASHR (12 years) vs MCHS (2 years). ASHR (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than MCHS (0.89). ASHR has a higher turnover MCHS (115.31) vs MCHS (115.31).
| ASHR | MCHS | ASHR / MCHS | |
| Gain YTD | 19.305 | 29.548 | 65% |
| Net Assets | 2.32B | 2.59M | 89,559% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.89 | 73% |
| Turnover | 143.00 | 115.31 | 124% |
| Yield | 0.94 | 4.18 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ASHR | MCHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FREL | 28.09 | 0.33 | +1.19% |
| Fidelity MSCI Real Estate ETF | |||
| PAPI | 26.29 | 0.07 | +0.27% |
| Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF | |||
| TRND | 33.05 | 0.06 | +0.19% |
| Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF | |||
| RBIL | 50.18 | 0.03 | +0.06% |
| F/m Ultrshrt Trs Infl-Protd Sec TIPS ETF | |||
| PCCE | 13.71 | -0.02 | -0.17% |
| Polen Capital China Growth ETF | |||
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | +2.01% | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.15% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.59% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 36% Loosely correlated | +3.18% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 33% Loosely correlated | +0.36% |