ASGOF
Price
$1.16
Change
+$0.02 (+1.75%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
501.57M
BCEKF
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
71.1M
64 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASGOF vs BCEKF

Header iconASGOF vs BCEKF Comparison
Open Charts ASGOF vs BCEKFBanner chart's image
Asante Gold
Price$1.16
Change+$0.02 (+1.75%)
Volume$3.78K
Capitalization501.57M
Bear Creek Mining
Price$0.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$131.92K
Capitalization71.1M
ASGOF vs BCEKF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ASGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BCEKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASGOF vs. BCEKF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASGOF is a Hold and BCEKF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (ASGOF: $1.16 vs. BCEKF: $0.16)
Brand notoriety: ASGOF and BCEKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASGOF: 29% vs. BCEKF: 49%
Market capitalization -- ASGOF: $501.57M vs. BCEKF: $71.1M
ASGOF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $501.57M. BCEKF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $71.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASGOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBCEKF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ASGOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BCEKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ASGOF is a better buy in the long-term than BCEKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASGOF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BCEKF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASGOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • BCEKF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCEKF is a better buy in the short-term than ASGOF.

Price Growth

ASGOF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +1.22% price change this week, while BCEKF (@Precious Metals) price change was +4.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCEKF is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASGOF($502M) has a higher market cap than BCEKF($71.1M). ASGOF YTD gains are higher at: 61.219 vs. BCEKF (-34.461). BCEKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 95K vs. ASGOF (-95.3M). ASGOF has more cash in the bank: 16.2M vs. BCEKF (9.63M). BCEKF has less debt than ASGOF: BCEKF (40M) vs ASGOF (51.3M). ASGOF has higher revenues than BCEKF: ASGOF (407M) vs BCEKF (85.3M).
ASGOFBCEKFASGOF / BCEKF
Capitalization502M71.1M706%
EBITDA-95.3M95K-100,312%
Gain YTD61.219-34.461-178%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue407M85.3M477%
Total Cash16.2M9.63M168%
Total Debt51.3M40M128%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASGOF vs BCEKF: Fundamental Ratings
ASGOF
BCEKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
41100
SMR RATING
1..100
10099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3760
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10094
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a5

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCEKF's Valuation (59) in the null industry is in the same range as ASGOF (80). This means that BCEKF’s stock grew similarly to ASGOF’s over the last 12 months.

ASGOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCEKF (100). This means that ASGOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCEKF’s over the last 12 months.

BCEKF's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as ASGOF (100). This means that BCEKF’s stock grew similarly to ASGOF’s over the last 12 months.

ASGOF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as BCEKF (60). This means that ASGOF’s stock grew similarly to BCEKF’s over the last 12 months.

BCEKF's P/E Growth Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as ASGOF (100). This means that BCEKF’s stock grew similarly to ASGOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASGOFBCEKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BCEKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSHPF10.14N/A
N/A
Pro-Ship Inc.
BACHY14.82-0.21
-1.41%
Bank of China, Ltd.
SWISF0.04N/A
-4.67%
SEKUR PRIVATE DATA LTD.
ASGLY5.56-0.38
-6.35%
AGC Inc.
TPGVF0.16-0.03
-15.38%
Top Glove Corp.

ASGOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ASGOF and BCEKF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASGOF and BCEKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASGOF
1D Price
Change %
ASGOF100%
+2.11%
BCEKF - ASGOF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.40%
BBBXF - ASGOF
3%
Poorly correlated
-6.10%
ORAAF - ASGOF
3%
Poorly correlated
-4.60%
AZASF - ASGOF
2%
Poorly correlated
+7.89%
AUIAF - ASGOF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-10.81%
More

BCEKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCEKF has been loosely correlated with SLVRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCEKF jumps, then SLVRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCEKF
1D Price
Change %
BCEKF100%
-1.40%
SLVRF - BCEKF
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.65%
ISVLF - BCEKF
41%
Loosely correlated
-4.54%
SLVTF - BCEKF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
LGDTF - BCEKF
38%
Loosely correlated
-3.10%
TORXF - BCEKF
38%
Loosely correlated
-3.97%
More