ASGN
Price
$51.60
Change
-$1.32 (-2.49%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.26B
38 days until earnings call
NABL
Price
$7.77
Change
-$0.31 (-3.84%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.47B
53 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASGN vs NABL

Header iconASGN vs NABL Comparison
Open Charts ASGN vs NABLBanner chart's image
ASGN
Price$51.60
Change-$1.32 (-2.49%)
Volume$427.22K
Capitalization2.26B
N-able
Price$7.77
Change-$0.31 (-3.84%)
Volume$793.12K
Capitalization1.47B
ASGN vs NABL Comparison Chart
Loading...
ASGN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NABL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASGN vs. NABL commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASGN is a Hold and NABL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (ASGN: $51.60 vs. NABL: $7.77)
Brand notoriety: ASGN and NABL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASGN: 85% vs. NABL: 72%
Market capitalization -- ASGN: $2.26B vs. NABL: $1.47B
ASGN [@Information Technology Services] is valued at $2.26B. NABL’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $1.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $257.65B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $10.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASGN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNABL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ASGN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NABL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NABL is a better buy in the long-term than ASGN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASGN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NABL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASGN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NABL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ASGN is a better buy in the short-term than NABL.

Price Growth

ASGN (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -3.12% price change this week, while NABL (@Information Technology Services) price change was -4.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -3.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.64%.

Reported Earning Dates

ASGN is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

NABL is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Information Technology Services (-3.27% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASGN($2.26B) has a higher market cap than NABL($1.47B). NABL has higher P/E ratio than ASGN: NABL (97.13) vs ASGN (14.74). NABL YTD gains are higher at: -16.809 vs. ASGN (-38.085). ASGN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 378M vs. NABL (97.1M). ASGN has more cash in the bank: 107M vs. NABL (94.1M). NABL has less debt than ASGN: NABL (370M) vs ASGN (1.35B). ASGN has higher revenues than NABL: ASGN (4.02B) vs NABL (471M).
ASGNNABLASGN / NABL
Capitalization2.26B1.47B154%
EBITDA378M97.1M389%
Gain YTD-38.085-16.809227%
P/E Ratio14.7497.1315%
Revenue4.02B471M853%
Total Cash107M94.1M114%
Total Debt1.35B370M364%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASGN: Fundamental Ratings
ASGN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
74
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
88
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
85
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASGNNABL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASGN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NABL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBMO25.570.02
+0.06%
iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bd ETF
CXH7.60-0.01
-0.18%
MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust
DMB10.04-0.02
-0.20%
BNY Mellon Municipal
IBDV21.72-0.05
-0.23%
iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corp ETF
RSBA20.68-0.09
-0.45%
Return Stacked Bonds & Mrg Arbtrg ETF

ASGN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASGN has been loosely correlated with CTSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ASGN jumps, then CTSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASGN
1D Price
Change %
ASGN100%
-2.49%
CTSH - ASGN
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.88%
FI - ASGN
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.98%
IT - ASGN
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.08%
CDW - ASGN
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.48%
ACN - ASGN
44%
Loosely correlated
-2.02%
More

NABL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NABL has been loosely correlated with VYX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NABL jumps, then VYX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NABL
1D Price
Change %
NABL100%
-3.84%
VYX - NABL
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.95%
CDW - NABL
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.48%
IT - NABL
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.08%
ASGN - NABL
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.49%
CNDT - NABL
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
More