ASGLY
Price
$6.71
Change
-$0.14 (-2.04%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
Capitalization
7.03B
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TYNPF
Price
$30.70
Change
-$0.85 (-2.69%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
Capitalization
13.05B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASGLY vs TYNPF

Header iconASGLY vs TYNPF Comparison
Open Charts ASGLY vs TYNPFBanner chart's image
AGC
Price$6.71
Change-$0.14 (-2.04%)
Volume$873
Capitalization7.03B
Nippon Sanso Holdings
Price$30.70
Change-$0.85 (-2.69%)
Volume$4.19K
Capitalization13.05B
ASGLY vs TYNPF Comparison Chart in %
ASGLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TYNPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASGLY vs. TYNPF commentary
Dec 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASGLY is a Hold and TYNPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 13, 2025
Stock price -- (ASGLY: $6.71 vs. TYNPF: $30.70)
Brand notoriety: ASGLY and TYNPF are both not notable
ASGLY represents the Industrial Conglomerates, while TYNPF is part of the Chemicals: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASGLY: 51% vs. TYNPF: 233%
Market capitalization -- ASGLY: $7.03B vs. TYNPF: $13.05B
ASGLY [@Industrial Conglomerates] is valued at $7.03B. TYNPF’s [@Chemicals: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $13.05B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $139.42B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $56.05B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Conglomerates] industry is $14.83B. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Major Diversified] industry is $6.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASGLY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTYNPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ASGLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TYNPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ASGLY is a better buy in the long-term than TYNPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASGLY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TYNPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASGLY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TYNPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ASGLY is a better buy in the short-term than TYNPF.

Price Growth

ASGLY (@Industrial Conglomerates) experienced а +2.44% price change this week, while TYNPF (@Chemicals: Major Diversified) price change was -0.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.80%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Major Diversified industry was -0.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

ASGLY is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Conglomerates (+0.44% weekly)

Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).

@Chemicals: Major Diversified (-0.41% weekly)

The major diversified chemicals industry includes companies that produce a wide range of chemicals and industrial gases. The products are often used as raw materials in the manufacturing of various types of goods, including plastics, paints, carpets, and fixtures to name a few. Major companies making diversified chemicals include DuPont de Nemours Inc., Celanese Corporation, Celanese Corporation and Westlake Chemical Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TYNPF($13B) has a higher market cap than ASGLY($7.03B). ASGLY has higher P/E ratio than TYNPF: ASGLY (32.26) vs TYNPF (19.35). ASGLY YTD gains are higher at: 12.773 vs. TYNPF (5.130). TYNPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 292B vs. ASGLY (270B). TYNPF has more cash in the bank: 150B vs. ASGLY (100B). ASGLY has less debt than TYNPF: ASGLY (651B) vs TYNPF (872B). ASGLY has higher revenues than TYNPF: ASGLY (2.05T) vs TYNPF (1.29T).
ASGLYTYNPFASGLY / TYNPF
Capitalization7.03B13B54%
EBITDA270B292B92%
Gain YTD12.7735.130249%
P/E Ratio32.2619.35167%
Revenue2.05T1.29T159%
Total Cash100B150B67%
Total Debt651B872B75%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASGLY: Fundamental Ratings
ASGLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
80
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
79
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
25
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASGLYTYNPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASGLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TYNPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IAPR30.700.06
+0.20%
Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF Apr
FLCC32.970.06
+0.18%
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF
NOVP30.460.02
+0.05%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Nov
CCMG31.39N/A
N/A
CCM Global Equity ETF
FXED18.25-0.02
-0.11%
Sound Enhanced Fixed Income ETF

TYNPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TYNPF and CBT have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TYNPF and CBT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TYNPF
1D Price
Change %
TYNPF100%
-2.68%
CBT - TYNPF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
OEC - TYNPF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
AVNT - TYNPF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.25%
TROX - TYNPF
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.87%
SKFOF - TYNPF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.76%
More