ASGLF vs WTTR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASGLF is a Hold and WTTR is a Hold.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
WTTR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- WTTR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
| ASGLF | WTTR | ASGLF / WTTR | |
| Capitalization | 7.86B | 948M | 829% |
| EBITDA | 238B | 165M | 144,242% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | -35.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 11.67 | 12.83 | 91% |
| Revenue | 2.05T | 1.59B | 129,464% |
| Total Cash | 202B | 57.1M | 353,765% |
| Total Debt | 706B | 53M | 1,332,075% |
ASGLF | WTTR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 18 Undervalued | 74 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 42 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 85 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | 81 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 5 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 | 33 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ASGLF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WTTR (74) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that ASGLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WTTR’s over the last 12 months.
WTTR's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASGLF (100) in the null industry. This means that WTTR’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASGLF’s over the last 12 months.
WTTR's SMR Rating (85) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as ASGLF (87) in the null industry. This means that WTTR’s stock grew similarly to ASGLF’s over the last 12 months.
ASGLF's Price Growth Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as WTTR (81) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that ASGLF’s stock grew similarly to WTTR’s over the last 12 months.
ASGLF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as WTTR (5) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that ASGLF’s stock grew similarly to WTTR’s over the last 12 months.
| WTTR | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% |
ASGLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ASGLF and NDEKY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASGLF and NDEKY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ASGLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASGLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NDEKY - ASGLF | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.55% | ||
| TKCBY - ASGLF | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ECL - ASGLF | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.17% | ||
| SCL - ASGLF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.87% | ||
| WTTR - ASGLF | 21% Poorly correlated | +3.88% | ||
More | ||||
WTTR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WTTR has been loosely correlated with OEC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WTTR jumps, then OEC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WTTR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WTTR | 100% | +3.88% | ||
| OEC - WTTR | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.62% | ||
| MEOH - WTTR | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.67% | ||
| LYB - WTTR | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.48% | ||
| EMN - WTTR | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| WLK - WTTR | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.69% | ||
More | ||||