Advertisement
ASGLF vs TKCBY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASGLF is a Hold and TKCBY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ASGLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTKCBY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- ASGLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TKCBY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ASGLF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TKCBY’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ASGLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
- TKCBY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
Price Growth
ASGLF (@Industrial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TKCBY (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.80%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.95%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Conglomerates (+0.44% weekly)Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).
@Chemicals: Specialty (+0.15% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
| ASGLF | TKCBY | ASGLF / TKCBY | |
| Capitalization | 7.03B | 1.34B | 524% |
| EBITDA | 270B | -5.7B | -4,735% |
| Gain YTD | 3.754 | 5.034 | 75% |
| P/E Ratio | 29.23 | 18.49 | 158% |
| Revenue | 2.05T | 337B | 608% |
| Total Cash | 100B | 72.2B | 139% |
| Total Debt | 651B | 199B | 327% |
ASGLF | TKCBY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 44 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ASGLF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as TKCBY (27). This means that ASGLF’s stock grew similarly to TKCBY’s over the last 12 months.
ASGLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TKCBY (100). This means that ASGLF’s stock grew similarly to TKCBY’s over the last 12 months.
TKCBY's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as ASGLF (100). This means that TKCBY’s stock grew similarly to ASGLF’s over the last 12 months.
ASGLF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as TKCBY (56). This means that ASGLF’s stock grew similarly to TKCBY’s over the last 12 months.
TKCBY's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as ASGLF (38). This means that TKCBY’s stock grew similarly to ASGLF’s over the last 12 months.
| ASGLF | TKCBY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 17% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 7% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 24% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 14% | 3 days ago 7% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 14% | 3 days ago 6% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 5% | N/A |
Advertisement
TKCBY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TKCBY and TKCBF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TKCBY and TKCBF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TKCBY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TKCBY | 100% | N/A | ||
| TKCBF - TKCBY | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FF - TKCBY | 22% Poorly correlated | +8.81% | ||
| MTLHY - TKCBY | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.97% | ||
| SCL - TKCBY | 20% Poorly correlated | +2.71% | ||
| SYIEF - TKCBY | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.05% | ||
More | ||||