Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ASCZX vs WCMLX
ASCZX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts ASCZX vs WCMLX
Alger Small Cap Growth Z
Price$12.30
Change+$0.03 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets199.58M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.08
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.65M
ASCZX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ASCZX vs. WCMLX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASCZX is a StrongBuy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASCZX has more cash in the bank: 200M vs. WCMLX (44.7M). ASCZX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . ASCZX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: ASCZX (15 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than ASCZX (1.03). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. ASCZX (49.68). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than ASCZX: WCMLX (100000) vs ASCZX (500000). ASCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.85 vs. WCMLX (8.14). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -4.02 vs. ASCZX (-23.53).
| ASCZX | WCMLX | ASCZX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.99 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.79 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.111 | 9.487 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 100000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 200M | 44.7M | 447% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.85 | 8.14 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.69 | 33.08 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.53 | -4.02 | 585% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.77 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement