Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ASCZX vs WCMLX
ASCZX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts ASCZX vs WCMLX
Alger Small Cap Growth Z
Price$12.76
Change+$0.02 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.79M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.80
Change+$0.05 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.47M
ASCZX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ASCZX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASCZX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASCZX has more cash in the bank: 205M vs. WCMLX (47.5M). ASCZX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . ASCZX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: ASCZX (15 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than ASCZX (1.03). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. ASCZX (49.68). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than ASCZX: WCMLX (100000) vs ASCZX (500000). ASCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.39 vs. WCMLX (13.24). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -2.44 vs. ASCZX (-22.68).
| ASCZX | WCMLX | ASCZX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.99 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.79 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.957 | 7.558 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 100000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 205M | 47.5M | 432% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.39 | 13.24 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.63 | 29.48 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.68 | -2.44 | 930% |
| Returns for 10 years | 126.62 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement