ASCN
Price
$103.90
Change
-$1.10 (-1.05%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
UOVEF
Price
$28.35
Change
+$0.89 (+3.24%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
37.94B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASCN vs UOVEF

Header iconASCN vs UOVEF Comparison
Open Charts ASCN vs UOVEFBanner chart's image
Absecon Ban
Price$103.90
Change-$1.10 (-1.05%)
Volume$800
CapitalizationN/A
United Overseas Bank
Price$28.35
Change+$0.89 (+3.24%)
Volume$4.04K
Capitalization37.94B
ASCN vs UOVEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ASCN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UOVEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASCN vs. UOVEF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASCN is a Hold and UOVEF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (ASCN: $103.90 vs. UOVEF: $28.35)
Brand notoriety: ASCN and UOVEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASCN: 202% vs. UOVEF: 169%
Market capitalization -- ASCN: $0 vs. UOVEF: $37.94B
ASCN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. UOVEF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $37.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASCN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUOVEF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ASCN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UOVEF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, UOVEF is a better buy in the long-term than ASCN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASCN’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UOVEF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASCN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • UOVEF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ASCN is a better buy in the short-term than UOVEF.

Price Growth

ASCN (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while UOVEF (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASCN YTD gains are higher at: 22.912 vs. UOVEF (0.532).
ASCNUOVEFASCN / UOVEF
CapitalizationN/A37.9B-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD22.9120.5324,307%
P/E RatioN/A7.90-
RevenueN/A13.6B-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A33.9B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASCN vs UOVEF: Fundamental Ratings
ASCN
UOVEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10013
SMR RATING
1..100
1005
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4751
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4144
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ASCN's Valuation (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UOVEF (69). This means that ASCN’s stock grew somewhat faster than UOVEF’s over the last 12 months.

UOVEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ASCN (100). This means that UOVEF’s stock grew significantly faster than ASCN’s over the last 12 months.

UOVEF's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ASCN (100). This means that UOVEF’s stock grew significantly faster than ASCN’s over the last 12 months.

ASCN's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as UOVEF (51). This means that ASCN’s stock grew similarly to UOVEF’s over the last 12 months.

ASCN's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as UOVEF (44). This means that ASCN’s stock grew similarly to UOVEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASCNUOVEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASCN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UOVEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MNPR36.251.09
+3.10%
Monopar Therapeutics Inc
MATV7.580.19
+2.57%
Mativ Holdings
HTCO0.210.01
+2.47%
High-Trend International Group
IPAR138.551.14
+0.83%
Interparfums Inc
XYZ69.230.01
+0.01%
Block Inc

ASCN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ASCN and CNBN have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASCN and CNBN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASCN
1D Price
Change %
ASCN100%
N/A
CNBN - ASCN
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSTS - ASCN
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
BPRN - ASCN
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.97%
CHMG - ASCN
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
CYSM - ASCN
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

UOVEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UOVEF and ASCN have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UOVEF and ASCN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UOVEF
1D Price
Change %
UOVEF100%
N/A
ASCN - UOVEF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PPERF - UOVEF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNCFF - UOVEF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
USMT - UOVEF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNCRY - UOVEF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
More