ASCN
Price
$98.00
Change
+$0.50 (+0.51%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
10.82M
BPRN
Price
$32.28
Change
-$0.35 (-1.07%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
217.82M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASCN vs BPRN

Header iconASCN vs BPRN Comparison
Open Charts ASCN vs BPRNBanner chart's image
Absecon Ban
Price$98.00
Change+$0.50 (+0.51%)
Volume$100
Capitalization10.82M
Princeton Ban
Price$32.28
Change-$0.35 (-1.07%)
Volume$4.92K
Capitalization217.82M
ASCN vs BPRN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ASCN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BPRN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASCN vs. BPRN commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASCN is a Buy and BPRN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (ASCN: $98.00 vs. BPRN: $32.28)
Brand notoriety: ASCN and BPRN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASCN: 40% vs. BPRN: 46%
Market capitalization -- ASCN: $10.82M vs. BPRN: $217.82M
ASCN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $10.82M. BPRN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $217.82M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASCN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBPRN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ASCN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BPRN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ASCN is a better buy in the long-term than BPRN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASCN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BPRN’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASCN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BPRN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BPRN is a better buy in the short-term than ASCN.

Price Growth

ASCN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.51% price change this week, while BPRN (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BPRN($218M) has a higher market cap than ASCN($10.8M). BPRN has higher P/E ratio than ASCN: BPRN (33.98) vs ASCN (10.02). ASCN YTD gains are higher at: 15.932 vs. BPRN (-3.503). BPRN has more cash in the bank: 20.2M vs. ASCN (1.52M).
ASCNBPRNASCN / BPRN
Capitalization10.8M218M5%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.932-3.503-455%
P/E Ratio10.0233.9829%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash1.52M20.2M8%
Total DebtN/A22.2M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASCN vs BPRN: Fundamental Ratings
ASCN
BPRN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4514
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10032
SMR RATING
1..100
10062
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4953
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
394
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ASCN's Valuation (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPRN (85) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ASCN’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPRN’s over the last 12 months.

BPRN's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for ASCN (100) in the null industry. This means that BPRN’s stock grew significantly faster than ASCN’s over the last 12 months.

BPRN's SMR Rating (62) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASCN (100) in the null industry. This means that BPRN’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASCN’s over the last 12 months.

ASCN's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as BPRN (53) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ASCN’s stock grew similarly to BPRN’s over the last 12 months.

BPRN's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASCN (39) in the null industry. This means that BPRN’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASCN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASCNBPRN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASCN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BPRN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
YARIY18.650.19
+1.03%
Yara International ASA
HKTVY3.60N/A
N/A
Hong Kong Technology Venture Company Ltd
ORRAF1.12N/A
N/A
Orora Ltd
CLRUF11.00N/A
N/A
ClimateRock
DSHK0.09-0.01
-8.16%
Drive Shack Inc.

ASCN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ASCN and CNBN have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASCN and CNBN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASCN
1D Price
Change %
ASCN100%
N/A
CNBN - ASCN
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSTS - ASCN
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPRN - ASCN
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.07%
CHMG - ASCN
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.43%
CYSM - ASCN
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
More

BPRN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPRN has been loosely correlated with FISI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPRN jumps, then FISI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPRN
1D Price
Change %
BPRN100%
-1.07%
FISI - BPRN
63%
Loosely correlated
-2.31%
AROW - BPRN
63%
Loosely correlated
-2.66%
RBB - BPRN
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.07%
MCBS - BPRN
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.95%
BLFY - BPRN
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.73%
More