Advertisement
ASCBF vs FLAG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASCBF is a Hold and FLAG is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ASCBF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
- ASCBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
ASCBF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +1.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +66.58%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (+1.27% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| ASCBF | FLAG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 23% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 21% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 24% | 2 days ago 35% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago 35% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 43% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
ASCBF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ASCBF and PLMIU have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASCBF and PLMIU's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ASCBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASCBF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PLMIU - ASCBF | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PEGR - ASCBF | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ASUUF - ASCBF | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MNTN - ASCBF | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.42% | ||
| VMCUF - ASCBF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
FLAG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLAG has been loosely correlated with CSLUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLAG jumps, then CSLUF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLAG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLAG | 100% | N/A | ||
| CSLUF - FLAG | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ASCBF - FLAG | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FGMCU - FLAG | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FGMC - FLAG | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
| LION - FLAG | 1% Poorly correlated | -2.34% | ||
More | ||||