ASBFY
Price
$28.56
Change
-$0.03 (-0.10%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
20.18B
27 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
USNA
Price
$20.00
Change
+$0.40 (+2.04%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
365.62M
46 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASBFY vs USNA

Header iconASBFY vs USNA Comparison
Open Charts ASBFY vs USNABanner chart's image
Associated British Foods
Price$28.56
Change-$0.03 (-0.10%)
Volume$34.47K
Capitalization20.18B
USANA Health Sciences
Price$20.00
Change+$0.40 (+2.04%)
Volume$79.94K
Capitalization365.62M
ASBFY vs USNA Comparison Chart in %
ASBFY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
USNA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASBFY vs. USNA commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASBFY is a Hold and USNA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (ASBFY: $28.56 vs. USNA: $20.00)
Brand notoriety: ASBFY and USNA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASBFY: 75% vs. USNA: 30%
Market capitalization -- ASBFY: $20.18B vs. USNA: $365.62M
ASBFY [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $20.18B. USNA’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $365.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $254.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASBFY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUSNA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ASBFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • USNA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ASBFY is a better buy in the long-term than USNA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASBFY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USNA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASBFY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • USNA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, USNA is a better buy in the short-term than ASBFY.

Price Growth

ASBFY (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +1.00% price change this week, while USNA (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was -2.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

ASBFY is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

USNA is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.66% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASBFY($20.2B) has a higher market cap than USNA($366M). USNA has higher P/E ratio than ASBFY: USNA (22.22) vs ASBFY (14.93). ASBFY YTD gains are higher at: 13.020 vs. USNA (-44.274). ASBFY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.97B vs. USNA (83.9M). ASBFY has higher revenues than USNA: ASBFY (19.8B) vs USNA (913M).
ASBFYUSNAASBFY / USNA
Capitalization20.2B366M5,519%
EBITDA2.97B83.9M3,544%
Gain YTD13.020-44.274-29%
P/E Ratio14.9322.2267%
Revenue19.8B913M2,169%
Total CashN/A145M-
Total DebtN/A23M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASBFY vs USNA: Fundamental Ratings
ASBFY
USNA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5059
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
83100
SMR RATING
1..100
5387
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5265
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1611
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5038

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ASBFY's Valuation (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for USNA (85) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that ASBFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than USNA’s over the last 12 months.

ASBFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as USNA (100) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that ASBFY’s stock grew similarly to USNA’s over the last 12 months.

ASBFY's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for USNA (87) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that ASBFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than USNA’s over the last 12 months.

ASBFY's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as USNA (65) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that ASBFY’s stock grew similarly to USNA’s over the last 12 months.

USNA's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as ASBFY (16) in the null industry. This means that USNA’s stock grew similarly to ASBFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASBFYUSNA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASBFY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
USNA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WUGI73.120.34
+0.47%
AXS Esoterica NextG Economy ETF
FBCV35.920.13
+0.36%
Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF
FNDA32.130.11
+0.34%
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small CompanyETF
DIAX15.200.03
+0.20%
Nuveen DOW 30Sm Dynamic Overwrite Fund
NJNK20.390.03
+0.15%
Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF

ASBFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ASBFY and HNFSA have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASBFY and HNFSA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASBFY
1D Price
Change %
ASBFY100%
-0.10%
HNFSA - ASBFY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SAPIF - ASBFY
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
USNA - ASBFY
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.04%
DAR - ASBFY
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.78%
MDLZ - ASBFY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
More

USNA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USNA has been loosely correlated with HLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if USNA jumps, then HLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USNA
1D Price
Change %
USNA100%
+2.04%
HLF - USNA
44%
Loosely correlated
+3.28%
AJINF - USNA
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CENTA - USNA
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.16%
CENT - USNA
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.12%
STKL - USNA
33%
Poorly correlated
+3.28%
More