ASAPF
Price
$0.18
Change
-$0.01 (-5.26%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
14.03M
FDMDF
Price
$0.33
Change
+$0.04 (+13.79%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
469.07M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASAPF vs FDMDF

Header iconASAPF vs FDMDF Comparison
Open Charts ASAPF vs FDMDFBanner chart's image
Aurora Spine
Price$0.18
Change-$0.01 (-5.26%)
Volume$132.29K
Capitalization14.03M
4DMEDICAL
Price$0.33
Change+$0.04 (+13.79%)
Volume$5.11K
Capitalization469.07M
ASAPF vs FDMDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ASAPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FDMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASAPF vs. FDMDF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASAPF is a Hold and FDMDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (ASAPF: $0.18 vs. FDMDF: $0.33)
Brand notoriety: ASAPF and FDMDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASAPF: 299% vs. FDMDF: 250%
Market capitalization -- ASAPF: $14.03M vs. FDMDF: $469.07M
ASAPF [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $14.03M. FDMDF’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $469.07M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $231.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASAPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFDMDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ASAPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FDMDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FDMDF is a better buy in the long-term than ASAPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASAPF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FDMDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASAPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FDMDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FDMDF is a better buy in the short-term than ASAPF.

Price Growth

ASAPF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -9.13% price change this week, while FDMDF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (+0.01% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDMDF($469M) has a higher market cap than ASAPF($14M). FDMDF YTD gains are higher at: -2.250 vs. ASAPF (-35.125). ASAPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 64.7K vs. FDMDF (-34.29M). ASAPF has higher revenues than FDMDF: ASAPF (18M) vs FDMDF (5.15M).
ASAPFFDMDFASAPF / FDMDF
Capitalization14M469M3%
EBITDA64.7K-34.29M-0%
Gain YTD-35.125-2.2501,561%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue18M5.15M349%
Total Cash489KN/A-
Total Debt3.68MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASAPF: Fundamental Ratings
ASAPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
87
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASAPFFDMDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
86%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
13%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
25%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
17%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASAPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FDMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FBSFF18.00N/A
N/A
Fabasoft AG
THDDY20.60N/A
N/A
TV Asahi Holdings Corp.
CNLTN33.40N/A
N/A
Connecticut Light & Power Co. (The)
LKNCY36.50-0.54
-1.46%
Luckin Coffee Inc.
PGXPF0.11-0.01
-6.78%
Pelangio Exploration Inc.

ASAPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ASAPF and BVS have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASAPF and BVS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASAPF
1D Price
Change %
ASAPF100%
-3.72%
BVS - ASAPF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
INBS - ASAPF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.97%
LNSR - ASAPF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FDMDF - ASAPF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KSRBF - ASAPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FDMDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FDMDF and PFGTF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FDMDF and PFGTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDMDF
1D Price
Change %
FDMDF100%
N/A
PFGTF - FDMDF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WUXIF - FDMDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASAPF - FDMDF
3%
Poorly correlated
-3.72%
QIPT - FDMDF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
IMTH - FDMDF
1%
Poorly correlated
+18.43%
More