ASAPF
Price
$0.21
Change
-$0.01 (-4.55%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
16.29M
FDMDF
Price
$1.30
Change
+$0.30 (+30.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
550.72M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASAPF vs FDMDF

Header iconASAPF vs FDMDF Comparison
Open Charts ASAPF vs FDMDFBanner chart's image
Aurora Spine
Price$0.21
Change-$0.01 (-4.55%)
Volume$15K
Capitalization16.29M
4DMEDICAL
Price$1.30
Change+$0.30 (+30.00%)
Volume$2.53K
Capitalization550.72M
ASAPF vs FDMDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ASAPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FDMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASAPF vs. FDMDF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASAPF is a Hold and FDMDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (ASAPF: $0.21 vs. FDMDF: $1.30)
Brand notoriety: ASAPF and FDMDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASAPF: 31% vs. FDMDF: 31%
Market capitalization -- ASAPF: $16.29M vs. FDMDF: $550.72M
ASAPF [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $16.29M. FDMDF’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $550.72M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $232.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASAPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFDMDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ASAPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FDMDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ASAPF is a better buy in the long-term than FDMDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASAPF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FDMDF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASAPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FDMDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FDMDF is a better buy in the short-term than ASAPF.

Price Growth

ASAPF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -0.81% price change this week, while FDMDF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +13.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -1.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.73%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (-1.97% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDMDF($551M) has a higher market cap than ASAPF($16.3M). FDMDF YTD gains are higher at: 282.353 vs. ASAPF (-23.832). ASAPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 88.7K vs. FDMDF (-34.29M). ASAPF has higher revenues than FDMDF: ASAPF (18.4M) vs FDMDF (5.15M).
ASAPFFDMDFASAPF / FDMDF
Capitalization16.3M551M3%
EBITDA88.7K-34.29M-0%
Gain YTD-23.832282.353-8%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue18.4M5.15M357%
Total Cash581KN/A-
Total Debt3.63MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASAPF: Fundamental Ratings
ASAPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
97
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASAPFFDMDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
19%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
78%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
19%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASAPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FDMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLRAX44.800.31
+0.70%
Nuveen Large Cap Select A
DESSX25.740.16
+0.63%
DWS ESG Core Equity S
JDEUX48.720.28
+0.57%
JPMorgan US Research Enhanced Equity R6
TESGX9.150.04
+0.44%
Templeton Global Smaller Comp C
AIIEX23.910.05
+0.21%
Invesco EQV International Equity A

ASAPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ASAPF and BVS have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASAPF and BVS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASAPF
1D Price
Change %
ASAPF100%
-3.75%
BVS - ASAPF
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.48%
INBS - ASAPF
8%
Poorly correlated
-12.50%
LNSR - ASAPF
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.40%
FDMDF - ASAPF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KSRBF - ASAPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FDMDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FDMDF and PFGTF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FDMDF and PFGTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDMDF
1D Price
Change %
FDMDF100%
N/A
PFGTF - FDMDF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WUXIF - FDMDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASAPF - FDMDF
3%
Poorly correlated
-3.75%
QIPT - FDMDF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IMTH - FDMDF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More