AS
Price
$38.87
Change
+$0.68 (+1.78%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
7.96B
51 days until earnings call
MMA
Price
$1.25
Change
-$0.06 (-4.58%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
42.73M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AS vs MMA

Header iconAS vs MMA Comparison
Open Charts AS vs MMABanner chart's image
Amer Sports
Price$38.87
Change+$0.68 (+1.78%)
Volume$1.63M
Capitalization7.96B
Mixed Martial Arts Group
Price$1.25
Change-$0.06 (-4.58%)
Volume$111.19K
Capitalization42.73M
AS vs MMA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AS vs. MMA commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AS is a Hold and MMA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (AS: $38.87 vs. MMA: $1.25)
Brand notoriety: AS and MMA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AS: 33% vs. MMA: 44%
Market capitalization -- AS: $7.96B vs. MMA: $42.73M
AS [@Recreational Products] is valued at $7.96B. MMA’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $42.73M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMMA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MMA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AS and MMA are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MMA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MMA is a better buy in the short-term than AS.

Price Growth

AS (@Recreational Products) experienced а +2.69% price change this week, while MMA (@Recreational Products) price change was +12.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

AS is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+4.20% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AS($7.96B) has a higher market cap than MMA($42.7M). AS YTD gains are higher at: 39.020 vs. MMA (-11.348).
ASMMAAS / MMA
Capitalization7.96B42.7M18,649%
EBITDA518MN/A-
Gain YTD39.020-11.348-344%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue4.37BN/A-
Total Cash483MN/A-
Total Debt6.66BN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASMMA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FFEB52.740.30
+0.58%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Feb
MINV31.130.11
+0.34%
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF
NAPR51.190.13
+0.24%
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Pwr Bffr ETF Apr
LIAB152.93N/A
N/A
LifeX 2048 Infl-Prt Longevity Inc ETF
JPAN34.22-0.22
-0.64%
Matthews Japan Active ETF

AS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AS has been loosely correlated with MAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AS jumps, then MAT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AS
1D Price
Change %
AS100%
+1.78%
MAT - AS
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
YETI - AS
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.62%
BC - AS
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
FNKO - AS
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
THO - AS
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.28%
More

MMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MMA and AS have been poorly correlated (+-2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MMA and AS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMA
1D Price
Change %
MMA100%
-4.58%
AS - MMA
-2%
Poorly correlated
+1.78%
MAMO - MMA
-4%
Poorly correlated
-1.41%