ARWYF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
1.22M
CVOSF
Price
$6.48
Change
+$0.28 (+4.52%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
619.37M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ARWYF vs CVOSF

Header iconARWYF vs CVOSF Comparison
Open Charts ARWYF vs CVOSFBanner chart's image
ARWAY
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$50.81K
Capitalization1.22M
COVEO SOLUTIONS
Price$6.48
Change+$0.28 (+4.52%)
Volume$13.89K
Capitalization619.37M
ARWYF vs CVOSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ARWYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CVOSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ARWYF vs. CVOSF commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARWYF is a Hold and CVOSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (ARWYF: $0.03 vs. CVOSF: $6.48)
Brand notoriety: ARWYF and CVOSF are both not notable
ARWYF represents the Packaged Software, while CVOSF is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARWYF: 173% vs. CVOSF: 144%
Market capitalization -- ARWYF: $1.22M vs. CVOSF: $619.37M
ARWYF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.22M. CVOSF’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $619.37M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $338.79B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.1B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $27.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARWYF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCVOSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ARWYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CVOSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CVOSF is a better buy in the long-term than ARWYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ARWYF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CVOSF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ARWYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CVOSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ARWYF and CVOSF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ARWYF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -18.57% price change this week, while CVOSF (@Computer Communications) price change was +4.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.30%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +21.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.11% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Computer Communications (+0.85% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CVOSF($619M) has a higher market cap than ARWYF($1.22M). CVOSF YTD gains are higher at: 37.872 vs. ARWYF (1.423). ARWYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.58M vs. CVOSF (-8.04M). CVOSF has more cash in the bank: 128M vs. ARWYF (336). ARWYF has less debt than CVOSF: ARWYF (567) vs CVOSF (7.28M). CVOSF has higher revenues than ARWYF: CVOSF (137M) vs ARWYF (137K).
ARWYFCVOSFARWYF / CVOSF
Capitalization1.22M619M0%
EBITDA-1.58M-8.04M20%
Gain YTD1.42337.8724%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue137K137M0%
Total Cash336128M0%
Total Debt5677.28M0%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARWYFCVOSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
85%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ARWYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CVOSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JDEUX46.920.39
+0.84%
JPMorgan US Research Enhanced Equity R6
LGCSX19.470.08
+0.41%
Lord Abbett Global Equity R4
CFMDX15.920.06
+0.38%
Clarkston Founders Founders
FSSMX46.36-0.04
-0.09%
Fidelity Stock Selector Mid Cap
RGSCX23.64-0.23
-0.96%
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap C

ARWYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ARWYF and BMR have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ARWYF and BMR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARWYF
1D Price
Change %
ARWYF100%
-11.49%
BMR - ARWYF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
CVOSF - ARWYF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INSSF - ARWYF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FOXO - ARWYF
5%
Poorly correlated
-6.30%
XYLB - ARWYF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CVOSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CVOSF has been loosely correlated with SPMYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CVOSF jumps, then SPMYY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CVOSF
1D Price
Change %
CVOSF100%
N/A
SPMYY - CVOSF
55%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SPNUF - CVOSF
55%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VERB - CVOSF
39%
Loosely correlated
-14.98%
NPACY - CVOSF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GCT - CVOSF
23%
Poorly correlated
+30.52%
More