ARWYF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
BMR
Price
$2.70
Change
-$0.03 (-1.10%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

ARWYF vs BMR

Header iconARWYF vs BMR Comparison
Open Charts ARWYF vs BMRBanner chart's image
ARWAY
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.57K
CapitalizationN/A
Beamr Imaging
Price$2.70
Change-$0.03 (-1.10%)
Volume$133.96K
CapitalizationN/A
ARWYF vs BMR Comparison Chart
Loading...
BMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ARWYF vs. BMR commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARWYF is a Hold and BMR is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (ARWYF: $0.04 vs. BMR: $2.70)
Brand notoriety: ARWYF and BMR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARWYF: 8% vs. BMR: 88%
Market capitalization -- ARWYF: $13.14M vs. BMR: $92.9M
ARWYF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $13.14M. BMR’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $92.9M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARWYF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBMR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ARWYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BMR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BMR is a better buy in the long-term than ARWYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BMR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

ARWYF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -12.50% price change this week, while BMR (@Packaged Software) price change was -11.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

BMR is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.05% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMR($92.9M) has a higher market cap than ARWYF($13.1M). BMR YTD gains are higher at: 86.207 vs. ARWYF (-83.162). BMR has more cash in the bank: 6.12M vs. ARWYF (957K).
ARWYFBMRARWYF / BMR
Capitalization13.1M92.9M14%
EBITDAN/A-425K-
Gain YTD-83.16286.207-96%
P/E RatioN/A13.68-
RevenueN/A2.91M-
Total Cash957K6.12M16%
Total DebtN/A500K-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

ARWYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ARWYF and BMR have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ARWYF and BMR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARWYF
1D Price
Change %
ARWYF100%
-14.00%
BMR - ARWYF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
CVOSF - ARWYF
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
INSSF - ARWYF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
RBTC - ARWYF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FOXO - ARWYF
5%
Poorly correlated
-27.17%
More

BMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BMR has been loosely correlated with TMICF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BMR jumps, then TMICF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMR
1D Price
Change %
BMR100%
-1.10%
TMICF - BMR
62%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MARK - BMR
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
IMMR - BMR
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
THNCF - BMR
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LKCO - BMR
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.78%
More