Advertisement
ARVR vs QCOM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARVR is a Hold and QCOM is a Hold.
QCOM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 21 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ARVR | QCOM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 88% | 7 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 82% | 7 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 74% | 7 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 84% | 7 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 62% | 7 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 68% | 17 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 58% | 7 days ago 71% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IYT | 73.42 | 0.58 | +0.80% |
| iShares Transportation Average ETF | |||
| IWFL | 56.92 | N/A | N/A |
| ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Gr Fctr TR ETN | |||
| IDE | 11.67 | -0.01 | -0.09% |
| Voya Infrastructure Industrials AND Materials Fund | |||
| TAXE | 51.09 | -0.08 | -0.16% |
| T. Rowe Price Intermediate Muncpl IncETF | |||
| DGRO | 69.21 | -0.13 | -0.19% |
| iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | |||
ARVR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARVR has been closely correlated with MCHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ARVR jumps, then MCHP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ARVR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARVR | 100% | +3.09% | ||
| MCHP - ARVR | 76% Closely correlated | +6.16% | ||
| QCOM - ARVR | 72% Closely correlated | +1.55% | ||
| TSM - ARVR | 70% Closely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| TXN - ARVR | 70% Closely correlated | +4.19% | ||
| SNPS - ARVR | 69% Closely correlated | +2.53% | ||
More | ||||
QCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QCOM has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QCOM jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCOM | 100% | +1.55% | ||
| LRCX - QCOM | 80% Closely correlated | +2.21% | ||
| KLAC - QCOM | 78% Closely correlated | +2.82% | ||
| NXPI - QCOM | 77% Closely correlated | +7.95% | ||
| AMKR - QCOM | 76% Closely correlated | +7.71% | ||
| ADI - QCOM | 75% Closely correlated | +2.45% | ||
More | ||||