Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ARSVX vs SSGSX
ARSVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts ARSVX vs SSGSX
AMG River Road Small Cap Value N
Price$16.13
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.38
Change+$0.08 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
ARSVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARSVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARSVX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. ARSVX (1.14B). SSGSX pays higher dividends than ARSVX: SSGSX (0.47) vs ARSVX (0.19). ARSVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: ARSVX (20 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). ARSVX (1.37) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). ARSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). ARSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: ARSVX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). ARSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.96 vs. SSGSX (-1.56). ARSVX return over 5 years is better than : 47.73 vs. SSGSX (22.95).
| ARSVX | SSGSX | ARSVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 1.26 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 1.26 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.199 | 2.046 | 205% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 5.64B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 0.47 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.96 | -1.56 | -446% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.57 | 3.97 | 467% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.73 | 22.95 | 208% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.78 | 24.71 | 153% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement