Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ARSVX vs SSGSX
ARSVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts ARSVX vs SSGSX
AMG River Road Small Cap Value N
Price$14.56
Change+$0.05 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.06B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.63
Change+$0.07 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.12B
ARSVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARSVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARSVX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.12B vs. ARSVX (1.06B). SSGSX pays higher dividends than ARSVX: SSGSX (0.48) vs ARSVX (0.20). ARSVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: ARSVX (21 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). ARSVX (1.37) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.23). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. ARSVX (42.00). ARSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: ARSVX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.42 vs. ARSVX (-5.94). ARSVX return over 5 years is better than : 11.19 vs. SSGSX (-0.63).
| ARSVX | SSGSX | ARSVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 1.23 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 1.23 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.943 | -1.723 | 345% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 5.12B | 21% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.48 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.94 | -2.42 | 246% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.03 | 0.45 | 1,987% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.19 | -0.63 | -1,763% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.80 | 18.71 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement