Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ARSVX vs SSGSX
ARSVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts ARSVX vs SSGSX
AMG River Road Small Cap Value N
Price$14.54
Change-$1.10 (-7.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$48.32
Change+$1.94 (+4.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.04B
ARSVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARSVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARSVX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.04B vs. ARSVX (1.1B). SSGSX pays higher dividends than ARSVX: SSGSX (0.58) vs ARSVX (0.06). ARSVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: ARSVX (21 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). ARSVX (1.37) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.23). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. ARSVX (42.00). ARSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: ARSVX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.83 vs. ARSVX (-7.63). ARSVX return over 5 years is better than : 4.65 vs. SSGSX (-0.23).
| ARSVX | SSGSX | ARSVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 1.23 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 1.23 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.395 | 8.123 | 17% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.1B | 5.04B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.58 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.63 | 3.83 | -199% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.37 | -3.10 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.65 | -0.23 | -2,052% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.91 | 53.01 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement