Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ARSVX vs SSGSX
ARSVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts ARSVX vs SSGSX
AMG River Road Small Cap Value N
Price$15.73
Change-$0.10 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.11B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.49
Change-$0.48 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.5B
ARSVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARSVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARSVX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.5B vs. ARSVX (1.11B). SSGSX pays higher dividends than ARSVX: SSGSX (0.50) vs ARSVX (0.20). ARSVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: ARSVX (20 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). ARSVX (1.37) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). ARSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). ARSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: ARSVX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). ARSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.76 vs. SSGSX (-5.53). ARSVX return over 5 years is better than : 38.98 vs. SSGSX (15.88).
| ARSVX | SSGSX | ARSVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 1.26 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 1.26 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.615 | -2.025 | -80% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 5.5B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.50 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.76 | -5.53 | -68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.39 | -9.76 | -86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.98 | 15.88 | 246% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.04 | 15.23 | 197% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement