ARSSF
Price
$0.69
Change
+$0.05 (+7.81%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
1.81B
SFSHF
Price
$9.76
Change
+$1.02 (+11.67%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
2.48B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ARSSF vs SFSHF

Header iconARSSF vs SFSHF Comparison
Open Charts ARSSF vs SFSHFBanner chart's image
Assura
Price$0.69
Change+$0.05 (+7.81%)
Volume$2.41K
Capitalization1.81B
Safestore Holdings
Price$9.76
Change+$1.02 (+11.67%)
Volume$1.11K
Capitalization2.48B
ARSSF vs SFSHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ARSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ARSSF vs. SFSHF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARSSF is a Hold and SFSHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (ARSSF: $0.69 vs. SFSHF: $9.76)
Brand notoriety: ARSSF and SFSHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARSSF: 6% vs. SFSHF: 167%
Market capitalization -- ARSSF: $1.81B vs. SFSHF: $2.48B
ARSSF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $1.81B. SFSHF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $2.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARSSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSFSHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ARSSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SFSHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ARSSF is a better buy in the long-term than SFSHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ARSSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFSHF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ARSSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SFSHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ARSSF and SFSHF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ARSSF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +9.00% price change this week, while SFSHF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +11.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.64%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.51% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFSHF($2.48B) has a higher market cap than ARSSF($1.81B). ARSSF has higher P/E ratio than SFSHF: ARSSF (13.64) vs SFSHF (6.60). ARSSF YTD gains are higher at: 41.161 vs. SFSHF (24.262). SFSHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 337M vs. ARSSF (-92.4M). ARSSF has more cash in the bank: 118M vs. SFSHF (18.1M). SFSHF has less debt than ARSSF: SFSHF (795M) vs ARSSF (1.25B). SFSHF has higher revenues than ARSSF: SFSHF (222M) vs ARSSF (150M).
ARSSFSFSHFARSSF / SFSHF
Capitalization1.81B2.48B73%
EBITDA-92.4M337M-27%
Gain YTD41.16124.262170%
P/E Ratio13.646.60207%
Revenue150M222M68%
Total Cash118M18.1M652%
Total Debt1.25B795M158%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SFSHF: Fundamental Ratings
SFSHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
88
SMR RATING
1..100
77
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
78
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARSSFSFSHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ARSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GGOSX10.890.15
+1.40%
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Growth Svc
FKASX49.770.46
+0.93%
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap A
FNNEX68.400.62
+0.91%
American Funds New Economy 529-F-3
MLVOX19.660.11
+0.56%
MFS Low Volatility Equity R2
FBBAX28.150.13
+0.46%
First Foundation Total Return A

ARSSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ARSSF and MEIYF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ARSSF and MEIYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARSSF
1D Price
Change %
ARSSF100%
N/A
MEIYF - ARSSF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SFSHF - ARSSF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DRETF - ARSSF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAPGF - ARSSF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOWFF - ARSSF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
More

SFSHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SFSHF and ARSSF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SFSHF and ARSSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFSHF
1D Price
Change %
SFSHF100%
N/A
ARSSF - SFSHF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LSGOF - SFSHF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OGCP - SFSHF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAPGF - SFSHF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STGPF - SFSHF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More