Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ARSMX vs SSGSX
ARSMX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts ARSMX vs SSGSX
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value N
Price$9.97
Change-$0.04 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets354.2M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.32
Change-$0.05 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.73B
ARSMX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARSMX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jul 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARSMX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.73B vs. ARSMX (354M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than ARSMX: SSGSX (0.51) vs ARSMX (0.23). ARSMX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: ARSMX (18 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). ARSMX (1.29) and SSGSX (1.26) have similar cost to investors . ARSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). ARSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: ARSMX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). ARSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.48 vs. SSGSX (-10.22). ARSMX return over 5 years is better than : 49.08 vs. SSGSX (21.53).
| ARSMX | SSGSX | ARSMX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.26 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.26 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.746 | -2.391 | -157% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 354M | 5.73B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.51 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.48 | -10.22 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.03 | -6.16 | -130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.08 | 21.53 | 228% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.10 | 16.26 | 179% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers