Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ARSMX vs SSGSX
ARSMX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts ARSMX vs SSGSX
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value N
Price$9.75
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets364.55M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$48.32
Change+$1.94 (+4.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.04B
ARSMX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARSMX vs. SSGSX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARSMX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.04B vs. ARSMX (365M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than ARSMX: SSGSX (0.58) vs ARSMX (0.23). ARSMX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: ARSMX (19 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). ARSMX (1.29) and SSGSX (1.23) have similar cost to investors . SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. ARSMX (36.00). ARSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: ARSMX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.83 vs. ARSMX (-0.08). ARSMX return over 5 years is better than : 12.06 vs. SSGSX (-0.23).
| ARSMX | SSGSX | ARSMX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.23 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.23 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.309 | 8.123 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 365M | 5.04B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.58 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.08 | 3.83 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.66 | -3.10 | -183% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.06 | -0.23 | -5,328% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.62 | 53.01 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers