Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ARSMX vs SSGSX
ARSMX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts ARSMX vs SSGSX
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value N
Price$9.77
Change+$0.05 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets351.21M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.95
Change+$0.15 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.31B
ARSMX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARSMX vs. SSGSX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARSMX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.31B vs. ARSMX (351M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than ARSMX: SSGSX (0.48) vs ARSMX (0.22). ARSMX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: ARSMX (19 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). ARSMX (1.29) and SSGSX (1.26) have similar cost to investors . ARSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). ARSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: ARSMX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). ARSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.31 vs. SSGSX (-8.48). ARSMX return over 5 years is better than : 36.91 vs. SSGSX (18.06).
| ARSMX | SSGSX | ARSMX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.26 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.26 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.665 | -1.034 | -161% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 351M | 5.31B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.48 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.31 | -8.48 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.07 | 1.10 | 1,190% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.91 | 18.06 | 204% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.34 | 18.76 | 156% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers