Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ARSMX vs DFFVX
ARSMX vs DFFVX Comparison
Open Charts ARSMX vs DFFVX
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value N
Price$9.72
Change-$0.10 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets353.36M
ARSMX vs DFFVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARSMX vs. DFFVX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARSMX is a Buy and DFFVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFVX has more cash in the bank: 13.3B vs. ARSMX (353M). DFFVX pays higher dividends than ARSMX: DFFVX (1.72) vs ARSMX (0.22). ARSMX was incepted earlier than DFFVX: ARSMX (19 years) vs DFFVX (26 years). ARSMX (1.29) is less costly to investors than DFFVX (0.30). ARSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. DFFVX (7.00). DFFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than ARSMX: DFFVX (0) vs ARSMX (2000). DFFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.18 vs. ARSMX (-9.71). DFFVX return over 5 years is better than : 79.20 vs. ARSMX (29.30).
| ARSMX | DFFVX | ARSMX / DFFVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.29 | 445% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.30 | 430% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.185 | 5.769 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353M | 13.3B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 1.72 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.71 | -0.18 | 5,315% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.75 | 25.69 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.30 | 79.20 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.78 | 80.67 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers