Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ARSMX vs DFFVX
ARSMX vs DFFVX Comparison
Open Charts ARSMX vs DFFVX
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value N
Price$10.03
Change+$0.08 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets359.83M
ARSMX vs DFFVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARSMX vs. DFFVX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARSMX is a Buy and DFFVX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFVX has more cash in the bank: 13.9B vs. ARSMX (360M). DFFVX pays higher dividends than ARSMX: DFFVX (1.65) vs ARSMX (0.22). ARSMX was incepted earlier than DFFVX: ARSMX (19 years) vs DFFVX (26 years). ARSMX (1.29) is less costly to investors than DFFVX (0.30). ARSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. DFFVX (7.00). DFFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than ARSMX: DFFVX (0) vs ARSMX (2000). DFFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.27 vs. ARSMX (-10.71). DFFVX return over 5 years is better than : 71.07 vs. ARSMX (23.65).
| ARSMX | DFFVX | ARSMX / DFFVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.29 | 445% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.30 | 430% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.746 | 8.159 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 360M | 13.9B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 1.65 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.71 | -0.27 | 3,909% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.80 | 26.66 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.65 | 71.07 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.51 | 79.59 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement