Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ARSMX vs DFFVX
ARSMX vs DFFVX Comparison
Open Charts ARSMX vs DFFVX
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value N
Price$9.95
Change+$0.08 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets350.57M
DFA US Targeted Value I
Price$34.30
Change-$0.55 (-1.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.39B
ARSMX vs DFFVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARSMX vs. DFFVX commentary
Jul 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARSMX is a Buy and DFFVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFVX has more cash in the bank: 13.4B vs. ARSMX (351M). DFFVX pays higher dividends than ARSMX: DFFVX (1.63) vs ARSMX (0.23). ARSMX was incepted earlier than DFFVX: ARSMX (18 years) vs DFFVX (25 years). ARSMX (1.29) is less costly to investors than DFFVX (0.30). ARSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. DFFVX (7.00). DFFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than ARSMX: DFFVX (0) vs ARSMX (2000). DFFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.79 vs. ARSMX (5.97). DFFVX return over 5 years is better than : 116.56 vs. ARSMX (53.59).
| ARSMX | DFFVX | ARSMX / DFFVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.29 | 445% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.30 | 430% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.538 | 2.331 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 351M | 13.4B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 1.63 | 14% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.97 | 11.79 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.63 | 37.51 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.59 | 116.56 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.20 | 62.84 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement