ARSLF
Price
$0.35
Change
+$0.03 (+9.38%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
19.41M
ATHOF
Price
$4.32
Change
-$0.13 (-2.92%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.15B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ARSLF vs ATHOF

Header iconARSLF vs ATHOF Comparison
Open Charts ARSLF vs ATHOFBanner chart's image
ALTIMA ENERGY
Price$0.35
Change+$0.03 (+9.38%)
Volume$121.32K
Capitalization19.41M
Athabasca Oil
Price$4.32
Change-$0.13 (-2.92%)
Volume$88.96K
Capitalization2.15B
ARSLF vs ATHOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ARSLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ATHOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ARSLF vs. ATHOF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARSLF is a Hold and ATHOF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (ARSLF: $0.35 vs. ATHOF: $4.32)
Brand notoriety: ARSLF and ATHOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARSLF: 17% vs. ATHOF: 39%
Market capitalization -- ARSLF: $19.41M vs. ATHOF: $2.15B
ARSLF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $19.41M. ATHOF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $2.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $116.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARSLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileATHOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ARSLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ATHOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ATHOF is a better buy in the long-term than ARSLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ARSLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ATHOF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ARSLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • ATHOF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ATHOF is a better buy in the short-term than ARSLF.

Price Growth

ARSLF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -19.56% price change this week, while ATHOF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -1.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.66%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-0.25% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ATHOF($2.15B) has a higher market cap than ARSLF($19.4M). ARSLF has higher P/E ratio than ATHOF: ARSLF (18.25) vs ATHOF (6.93). ARSLF YTD gains are higher at: 232.212 vs. ATHOF (16.773). ATHOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 774M vs. ARSLF (-1.16M). ATHOF has more cash in the bank: 304M vs. ARSLF (852K). ARSLF has less debt than ATHOF: ARSLF (4.13M) vs ATHOF (196M). ATHOF has higher revenues than ARSLF: ATHOF (1.46B) vs ARSLF (3.34M).
ARSLFATHOFARSLF / ATHOF
Capitalization19.4M2.15B1%
EBITDA-1.16M774M-0%
Gain YTD232.21216.7731,384%
P/E Ratio18.256.93263%
Revenue3.34M1.46B0%
Total Cash852K304M0%
Total Debt4.13M196M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ARSLF vs ATHOF: Fundamental Ratings
ARSLF
ATHOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
744
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
718
SMR RATING
1..100
10035
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3744
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ATHOF's Valuation (61) in the null industry is in the same range as ARSLF (70). This means that ATHOF’s stock grew similarly to ARSLF’s over the last 12 months.

ATHOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ARSLF (71). This means that ATHOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ARSLF’s over the last 12 months.

ATHOF's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ARSLF (100). This means that ATHOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ARSLF’s over the last 12 months.

ARSLF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as ATHOF (44). This means that ARSLF’s stock grew similarly to ATHOF’s over the last 12 months.

ARSLF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ATHOF (100). This means that ARSLF’s stock grew significantly faster than ATHOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARSLFATHOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ARSLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ATHOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
POAHF42.751.55
+3.76%
Porsche Automobile Holding SE
CNGA0.07N/A
N/A
Conair Corp.
CYBQF1.29N/A
N/A
Cyberdyne Inc.
VCIGF2.86N/A
N/A
Vitreous Glass Inc.
WLWHY3.27N/A
N/A
Woolworths Holdings Ltd.

ARSLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ARSLF and ATHOF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ARSLF and ATHOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARSLF
1D Price
Change %
ARSLF100%
+7.97%
ATHOF - ARSLF
11%
Poorly correlated
-2.92%
ALOD - ARSLF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATUUF - ARSLF
3%
Poorly correlated
-5.59%
BCHEY - ARSLF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARSEF - ARSLF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ATHOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ATHOF has been closely correlated with TNEYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ATHOF jumps, then TNEYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ATHOF
1D Price
Change %
ATHOF100%
-2.92%
TNEYF - ATHOF
68%
Closely correlated
-1.54%
ZPTAF - ATHOF
66%
Closely correlated
-3.43%
MEGEF - ATHOF
66%
Closely correlated
-1.73%
CDDRF - ATHOF
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.45%
CRLFF - ATHOF
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.91%
More