Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ARRZX vs JVMCX
ARRZX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts ARRZX vs JVMCX
AMG River Road Focused Absolute Value Z
Price$12.97
Change-$1.23 (-8.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.32M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$26.89
Change-$0.78 (-2.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.66B
ARRZX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARRZX vs. JVMCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARRZX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.7B vs. ARRZX (49.3M). ARRZX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: ARRZX (1.03) vs JVMCX (0.00). ARRZX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: ARRZX (8 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than ARRZX (0.98). ARRZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ARRZX: JVMCX (1000) vs ARRZX (5000000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.34 vs. ARRZX (-1.71). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 15.97 vs. ARRZX (0.66).
| ARRZX | JVMCX | ARRZX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.85 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.86 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.765 | 5.121 | -15% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 1000 | 500,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.3M | 24.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.71 | 3.34 | -51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.12 | 6.94 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.66 | 15.97 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 61.82 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement