ARRRF
Price
$0.52
Change
+$0.05 (+10.64%)
Updated
Feb 5 closing price
Capitalization
109.1M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SRAFF
Price
$0.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Feb 5 closing price
Capitalization
258.83M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ARRRF vs SRAFF

Header iconARRRF vs SRAFF Comparison
Open Charts ARRRF vs SRAFFBanner chart's image
Ardea Res
Price$0.52
Change+$0.05 (+10.64%)
Volume$22K
Capitalization109.1M
Sandfire Resources America
Price$0.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$98.07K
Capitalization258.83M
ARRRF vs SRAFF Comparison Chart in %
ARRRF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SRAFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ARRRF vs. SRAFF commentary
Feb 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARRRF is a StrongBuy and SRAFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 07, 2026
Stock price -- (ARRRF: $0.52 vs. SRAFF: $0.25)
Brand notoriety: ARRRF and SRAFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARRRF: 347% vs. SRAFF: 137%
Market capitalization -- ARRRF: $109.1M vs. SRAFF: $258.83M
ARRRF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $109.1M. SRAFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $258.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARRRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSRAFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ARRRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SRAFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ARRRF is a better buy in the long-term than SRAFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ARRRF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SRAFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ARRRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SRAFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ARRRF and SRAFF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ARRRF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +11.61% price change this week, while SRAFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -6.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -4.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +72.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-4.23% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SRAFF($259M) has a higher market cap than ARRRF($109M). ARRRF YTD gains are higher at: 26.260 vs. SRAFF (10.000).
ARRRFSRAFFARRRF / SRAFF
Capitalization109M259M42%
EBITDAN/A-21.36M-
Gain YTD26.26010.000263%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A481K-
Total DebtN/A68.8M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ARRRF vs SRAFF: Fundamental Ratings
ARRRF
SRAFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2385
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8866
SMR RATING
1..100
95100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3749
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8590

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ARRRF's Valuation (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SRAFF (85). This means that ARRRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SRAFF’s over the last 12 months.

SRAFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as ARRRF (88). This means that SRAFF’s stock grew similarly to ARRRF’s over the last 12 months.

ARRRF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as SRAFF (100). This means that ARRRF’s stock grew similarly to SRAFF’s over the last 12 months.

ARRRF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as SRAFF (49). This means that ARRRF’s stock grew similarly to SRAFF’s over the last 12 months.

ARRRF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SRAFF (100). This means that ARRRF’s stock grew similarly to SRAFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARRRFSRAFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ARRRF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SRAFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIVVX38.430.03
+0.08%
Nomura Opportunity R6
FESIX5.19N/A
N/A
Fidelity SAI Real Estate Index
EEMGX10.84-0.11
-1.00%
MFS Emerging Markets Equity Research R4
CZMSX16.06-0.20
-1.23%
Multi-Manager Small Cap Eq Strat Inst
VRTTX579.15-7.42
-1.26%
Vanguard Russell 3000 Index I

ARRRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ARRRF and AABB have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ARRRF and AABB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARRRF
1D Price
Change %
ARRRF100%
+10.64%
AABB - ARRRF
26%
Poorly correlated
-11.43%
SRAFF - ARRRF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
ARSMF - ARRRF
10%
Poorly correlated
-4.78%
ARAFF - ARRRF
5%
Poorly correlated
-3.09%
AOTVF - ARRRF
-6%
Poorly correlated
-7.57%

SRAFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SRAFF and EULIF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRAFF and EULIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRAFF
1D Price
Change %
SRAFF100%
-0.32%
EULIF - SRAFF
23%
Poorly correlated
+10.80%
ARRRF - SRAFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+10.64%
SRCGF - SRAFF
6%
Poorly correlated
-7.58%
SXOOF - SRAFF
6%
Poorly correlated
-4.89%
SRHYY - SRAFF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More