Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ARRFX vs JVMCX
ARRFX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts ARRFX vs JVMCX
AMG River Road Focused Absolute Value N
Price$13.20
Change-$0.08 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.18M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$26.99
Change-$0.07 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.93B
ARRFX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARRFX vs. JVMCX commentary
Jan 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARRFX is a Hold and JVMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.9B vs. ARRFX (51.2M). ARRFX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: ARRFX (0.76) vs JVMCX (0.00). ARRFX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: ARRFX (10 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than ARRFX (1.26). ARRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ARRFX: JVMCX (1000) vs ARRFX (2000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.37 vs. ARRFX (0.22). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 15.81 vs. ARRFX (1.75).
| ARRFX | JVMCX | ARRFX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.85 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.86 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.840 | 5.512 | 15% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.2M | 24.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.22 | 3.37 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.68 | 10.95 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.75 | 15.81 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.36 | 60.39 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement