Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ARRFX vs FSMDX
ARRFX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts ARRFX vs FSMDX
AMG River Road Focused Absolute Value N
Price$14.33
Change-$0.10 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.93M
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$36.54
Change-$0.66 (-1.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.03B
ARRFX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARRFX vs. FSMDX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARRFX is a Hold and FSMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45B vs. ARRFX (51.9M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than ARRFX: FSMDX (1.26) vs ARRFX (0.69). ARRFX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: ARRFX (10 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). ARRFX (1.26) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). ARRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than ARRFX: FSMDX (0) vs ARRFX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.61 vs. ARRFX (-6.70). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 55.70 vs. ARRFX (17.79).
| ARRFX | FSMDX | ARRFX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.03 | 4,240% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.03 | 5,040% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.977 | 10.424 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.9M | 45B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.26 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.70 | 4.61 | -146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.85 | 43.53 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.79 | 55.70 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.65 | 141.06 | 39% |