Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ARRFX vs FSMDX
ARRFX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts ARRFX vs FSMDX
AMG River Road Focused Absolute Value N
Price$14.99
Change-$0.03 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets54.41M
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$37.68
Change-$0.40 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.78B
ARRFX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARRFX vs. FSMDX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARRFX is a Buy and FSMDX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45.8B vs. ARRFX (54.4M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than ARRFX: FSMDX (1.24) vs ARRFX (0.66). ARRFX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: ARRFX (10 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). ARRFX (1.26) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). ARRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than ARRFX: FSMDX (0) vs ARRFX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.30 vs. ARRFX (-3.52). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 49.97 vs. ARRFX (18.02).
| ARRFX | FSMDX | ARRFX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.03 | 4,240% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.03 | 5,040% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.272 | 12.116 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 54.4M | 45.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 1.24 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.52 | 5.30 | -66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.37 | 45.03 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.02 | 49.97 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.59 | 150.80 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement