Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ARRFX vs FSMDX
ARRFX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts ARRFX vs FSMDX
AMG River Road Focused Absolute Value N
Price$13.39
Change+$0.19 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.87M
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$39.06
Change+$1.00 (+2.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.87B
ARRFX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARRFX vs. FSMDX commentary
Feb 08, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARRFX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 46.9B vs. ARRFX (50.9M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than ARRFX: FSMDX (1.07) vs ARRFX (0.77). ARRFX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: ARRFX (10 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). ARRFX (1.26) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). ARRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than ARRFX: FSMDX (0) vs ARRFX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.60 vs. ARRFX (-0.14). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 46.35 vs. ARRFX (2.98).
| ARRFX | FSMDX | ARRFX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.03 | 4,240% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.03 | 5,040% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.292 | 5.768 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.9M | 46.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 1.07 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.14 | 11.60 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.70 | 42.10 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.98 | 46.35 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.94 | 200.98 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement