Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ARRFX vs FLPSX
ARRFX vs FLPSX Comparison
Open Charts ARRFX vs FLPSX
AMG River Road Focused Absolute Value N
Price$14.42
Change+$0.17 (+1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.45M
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock
Price$45.31
Change+$0.13 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.07B
ARRFX vs FLPSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARRFX vs. FLPSX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARRFX is a Buy and FLPSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLPSX has more cash in the bank: 23.1B vs. ARRFX (52.4M). FLPSX pays higher dividends than ARRFX: FLPSX (1.73) vs ARRFX (0.70). ARRFX was incepted earlier than FLPSX: ARRFX (10 years) vs FLPSX (36 years). ARRFX (1.26) is less costly to investors than FLPSX (0.89). ARRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. FLPSX (23.00). FLPSX has a lower initial minimum investment than ARRFX: FLPSX (0) vs ARRFX (2000). ARRFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.93 vs. FLPSX (-4.83). ARRFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.09 vs. FLPSX (5.99).
| ARRFX | FLPSX | ARRFX / FLPSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.89 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.89 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.363 | 10.871 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.4M | 23.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 1.73 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.93 | -4.83 | -19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.79 | -5.74 | -310% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.09 | 5.99 | 452% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -2.04 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement