AROW
Price
$31.47
Change
-$0.16 (-0.51%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
517.44M
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CLST
Price
$15.53
Change
+$0.03 (+0.19%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
63.89M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AROW vs CLST

Header iconAROW vs CLST Comparison
Open Charts AROW vs CLSTBanner chart's image
Arrow Financial
Price$31.47
Change-$0.16 (-0.51%)
Volume$33.61K
Capitalization517.44M
Catalyst Ban
Price$15.53
Change+$0.03 (+0.19%)
Volume$631
Capitalization63.89M
AROW vs CLST Comparison Chart in %
AROW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CLST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AROW vs. CLST commentary
Dec 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AROW is a Buy and CLST is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 27, 2025
Stock price -- (AROW: $31.47 vs. CLST: $15.53)
Brand notoriety: AROW and CLST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AROW: 57% vs. CLST: 8%
Market capitalization -- AROW: $517.44M vs. CLST: $63.89M
AROW [@Regional Banks] is valued at $517.44M. CLST’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $63.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $170.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AROW’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLST’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AROW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CLST’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, AROW is a better buy in the long-term than CLST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AROW’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLST’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AROW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CLST’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AROW and CLST are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AROW (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.44% price change this week, while CLST (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

AROW is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.29% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AROW($517M) has a higher market cap than CLST($63.9M). CLST has higher P/E ratio than AROW: CLST (26.78) vs AROW (15.28). CLST YTD gains are higher at: 31.946 vs. AROW (13.134). CLST has less debt than AROW: CLST (14.7M) vs AROW (29.2M). AROW has higher revenues than CLST: AROW (156M) vs CLST (11.2M).
AROWCLSTAROW / CLST
Capitalization517M63.9M809%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.13431.94641%
P/E Ratio15.2826.7857%
Revenue156M11.2M1,393%
Total Cash33MN/A-
Total Debt29.2M14.7M199%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AROW vs CLST: Fundamental Ratings
AROW
CLST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1382
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
629
SMR RATING
1..100
4187
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4744
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4525
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AROW's Valuation (59) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CLST (85) in the null industry. This means that AROW’s stock grew similarly to CLST’s over the last 12 months.

CLST's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AROW (62) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CLST’s stock grew somewhat faster than AROW’s over the last 12 months.

AROW's SMR Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLST (87) in the null industry. This means that AROW’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLST’s over the last 12 months.

CLST's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as AROW (47) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CLST’s stock grew similarly to AROW’s over the last 12 months.

CLST's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is in the same range as AROW (45) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CLST’s stock grew similarly to AROW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AROWCLST
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
32%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AROW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CLST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
COSAF0.27N/A
+0.93%
COSA RES CORP.
BDOUF2.15N/A
N/A
BDO Unibank Inc.
ADKIL430.00N/A
N/A
Adkins Energy LLC
MTMV1.10N/A
N/A
MOTOMOVA INC.
BVHMY8.28N/A
N/A
VISTRY GROUP PLC.

AROW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AROW has been closely correlated with FMBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AROW jumps, then FMBH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AROW
1D Price
Change %
AROW100%
-0.51%
FMBH - AROW
83%
Closely correlated
-0.30%
INDB - AROW
83%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
TCBK - AROW
82%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
CTBI - AROW
82%
Closely correlated
-0.81%
MCBS - AROW
81%
Closely correlated
-0.89%
More

CLST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLST has been loosely correlated with BMRC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLST jumps, then BMRC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLST
1D Price
Change %
CLST100%
+0.19%
BMRC - CLST
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
TCBK - CLST
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
CFR - CLST
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
CARE - CLST
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
AROW - CLST
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
More