Advertisement
ARMK vs DAO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARMK is a Hold and DAO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ARMK’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDAO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ARMK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- DAO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ARMK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DAO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ARMK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- DAO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
ARMK (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а -0.77% price change this week, while DAO (@Other Consumer Specialties) price change was -2.79% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.94%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was +1.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.28%.
Reported Earning Dates
ARMK is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.
DAO is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Office Equipment/Supplies (-0.25% weekly)The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
@Other Consumer Specialties (+1.02% weekly)‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.
| ARMK | DAO | ARMK / DAO | |
| Capitalization | 10.2B | 1.04B | 978% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 297M | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.866 | 17.838 | 27% |
| P/E Ratio | 28.54 | 32.27 | 88% |
| Revenue | N/A | 5.63B | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 611M | - |
| Total Debt | 6.62B | 1.83B | 362% |
ARMK | DAO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 38 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 54 Fair valued | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 63 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 20 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ARMK's Valuation (54) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DAO (72) in the null industry. This means that ARMK’s stock grew similarly to DAO’s over the last 12 months.
ARMK's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for DAO (100) in the null industry. This means that ARMK’s stock grew significantly faster than DAO’s over the last 12 months.
ARMK's SMR Rating (63) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DAO (100) in the null industry. This means that ARMK’s stock grew somewhat faster than DAO’s over the last 12 months.
DAO's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as ARMK (57) in the Restaurants industry. This means that DAO’s stock grew similarly to ARMK’s over the last 12 months.
ARMK's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for DAO (97) in the null industry. This means that ARMK’s stock grew significantly faster than DAO’s over the last 12 months.
| ARMK | DAO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 10 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 60% | 14 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 71% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MGOV | 20.48 | 0.10 | +0.49% |
| First Trust Intermediate Gvt Opps ETF | |||
| CPSF | 24.98 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| Calamos S&P 500 Str Alt Prt ETF-Feb | |||
| PKB | 92.28 | -0.18 | -0.19% |
| Invesco Building & Construction ETF | |||
| QVML | 38.24 | -0.22 | -0.56% |
| Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF | |||
| BZQ | 9.93 | -0.28 | -2.74% |
| ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped | |||
ARMK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARMK has been loosely correlated with MSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ARMK jumps, then MSA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ARMK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARMK | 100% | -0.84% | ||
| MSA - ARMK | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.07% | ||
| ULS - ARMK | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| AZZ - ARMK | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| CTAS - ARMK | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.13% | ||
| EFX - ARMK | 46% Loosely correlated | +3.77% | ||
More | ||||
DAO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DAO has been loosely correlated with MRLWF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DAO jumps, then MRLWF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DAO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAO | 100% | +4.43% | ||
| MRLWF - DAO | 42% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CPBLF - DAO | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DIGTF - DAO | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| COUR - DAO | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.36% | ||
| ARMK - DAO | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.84% | ||
More | ||||