Advertisement
ARMK vs CTAS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARMK is a Hold and CTAS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ARMK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCTAS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- ARMK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- CTAS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ARMK’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CTAS’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ARMK’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
- CTAS’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
ARMK (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а +1.77% price change this week, while CTAS (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was +1.19% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.76%.
Reported Earning Dates
ARMK is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.
CTAS is expected to report earnings on Apr 01, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Office Equipment/Supplies (-2.49% weekly)The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
| ARMK | CTAS | ARMK / CTAS | |
| Capitalization | 10.4B | 78.7B | 13% |
| EBITDA | 1.27B | 2.92B | 43% |
| Gain YTD | 7.488 | 3.908 | 192% |
| P/E Ratio | 32.48 | 42.30 | 77% |
| Revenue | 18.5B | 10.6B | 175% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 138M | - |
| Total Debt | 5.72B | 2.68B | 214% |
ARMK | CTAS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 57 Fair valued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 39 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 68 | 21 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | 67 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ARMK's Valuation (57) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTAS (92) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that ARMK’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTAS’s over the last 12 months.
CTAS's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as ARMK (39) in the Restaurants industry. This means that CTAS’s stock grew similarly to ARMK’s over the last 12 months.
CTAS's SMR Rating (21) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ARMK (68) in the Restaurants industry. This means that CTAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than ARMK’s over the last 12 months.
CTAS's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as ARMK (58) in the Restaurants industry. This means that CTAS’s stock grew similarly to ARMK’s over the last 12 months.
CTAS's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as ARMK (75) in the Restaurants industry. This means that CTAS’s stock grew similarly to ARMK’s over the last 12 months.
| ARMK | CTAS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 41% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 51% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 60% | 5 days ago 39% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 56% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MMSC | 26.16 | 0.04 | +0.15% |
| First Trust Multi-Manager Sm Cp Opps ETF | |||
| MAXJ | 28.28 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF | |||
| IROC | 50.92 | -0.04 | -0.08% |
| Invesco Rochester High Yield Municipal ETF | |||
| DFIP | 41.60 | -0.08 | -0.18% |
| Dimensional Inflation-Protected Sec ETF | |||
| FMF | 48.60 | -0.22 | -0.45% |
| First Trust Managed Future Strategy ETF | |||
ARMK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARMK has been loosely correlated with MSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ARMK jumps, then MSA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ARMK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARMK | 100% | +1.56% | ||
| MSA - ARMK | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| CTAS - ARMK | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| ARLO - ARMK | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.71% | ||
| EXPO - ARMK | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| DLB - ARMK | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.39% | ||
More | ||||
CTAS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTAS has been loosely correlated with EXPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTAS jumps, then EXPO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTAS | 100% | -0.08% | ||
| EXPO - CTAS | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| RBA - CTAS | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.05% | ||
| UNF - CTAS | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| VRSK - CTAS | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| ARMK - CTAS | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.56% | ||
More | ||||