ARLUF
Price
$36.45
Change
-$7.22 (-16.53%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
22.8B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RSI
Price
$17.44
Change
+$0.32 (+1.87%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.68B
13 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ARLUF vs RSI

Header iconARLUF vs RSI Comparison
Open Charts ARLUF vs RSIBanner chart's image
Aristocrat Leisure
Price$36.45
Change-$7.22 (-16.53%)
Volume$5.02K
Capitalization22.8B
Rush Street Interactive
Price$17.44
Change+$0.32 (+1.87%)
Volume$27.15K
Capitalization1.68B
ARLUF vs RSI Comparison Chart in %
ARLUF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RSI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ARLUF vs. RSI commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARLUF is a Hold and RSI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (ARLUF: $36.45 vs. RSI: $17.12)
Brand notoriety: ARLUF and RSI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARLUF: 198% vs. RSI: 136%
Market capitalization -- ARLUF: $22.8B vs. RSI: $1.68B
ARLUF [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $22.8B. RSI’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $1.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $35.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $4.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARLUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRSI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ARLUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RSI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RSI is a better buy in the long-term than ARLUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ARLUF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RSI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ARLUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RSI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ARLUF is a better buy in the short-term than RSI.

Price Growth

ARLUF (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -6.54% price change this week, while RSI (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was +0.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -3.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was -15.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

RSI is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (-3.87% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ARLUF($22.8B) has a higher market cap than RSI($1.68B). RSI has higher P/E ratio than ARLUF: RSI (65.85) vs ARLUF (27.76). ARLUF YTD gains are higher at: -5.811 vs. RSI (-11.889). ARLUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.35B vs. RSI (109M). ARLUF has more cash in the bank: 959M vs. RSI (273M). RSI has less debt than ARLUF: RSI (5.84M) vs ARLUF (2.41B). ARLUF has higher revenues than RSI: ARLUF (6.37B) vs RSI (1.06B).
ARLUFRSIARLUF / RSI
Capitalization22.8B1.68B1,360%
EBITDA2.35B109M2,154%
Gain YTD-5.811-11.88949%
P/E Ratio27.7665.8542%
Revenue6.37B1.06B599%
Total Cash959M273M351%
Total Debt2.41B5.84M41,261%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ARLUF: Fundamental Ratings
ARLUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
32
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
57
SMR RATING
1..100
67
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
81
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
78
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARLUFRSI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ARLUF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RSI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRZU112.853.40
+3.11%
Direxion Daily MSCI Brazil Bull 2X ETF
RHRX18.990.09
+0.48%
RH Tactical Rotation ETF
SPIB33.76-0.01
-0.03%
State Street SPDR Port ItmtTermCorpBdETF
HFRO6.32-0.02
-0.32%
Highland Opportunities and Income Fund
GXPC31.01-0.46
-1.46%
Global X PureCap MSCI Comct Svcs ETF

ARLUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ARLUF and GMVHY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ARLUF and GMVHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARLUF
1D Price
Change %
ARLUF100%
+2.94%
GMVHY - ARLUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.33%
BRSL - ARLUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
CZR - ARLUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
RRR - ARLUF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
RSI - ARLUF
8%
Poorly correlated
-4.30%
More

RSI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RSI has been loosely correlated with DKNG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RSI jumps, then DKNG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSI
1D Price
Change %
RSI100%
-4.30%
DKNG - RSI
54%
Loosely correlated
-2.41%
FLUT - RSI
49%
Loosely correlated
-5.73%
RRR - RSI
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
CZR - RSI
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
GDEN - RSI
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.60%
More