ARHS
Price
$9.58
Change
-$0.11 (-1.14%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
111 days until earnings call
SSILF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 8 closing price
Ad is loading...

ARHS vs SSILF

Header iconARHS vs SSILF Comparison
Open Charts ARHS vs SSILFBanner chart's image
Arhaus
Price$9.58
Change-$0.11 (-1.14%)
Volume$1.24M
CapitalizationN/A
Sa Sa International Holdings
Price$0.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
ARHS vs SSILF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ARHS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ARHS vs. SSILF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARHS is a Buy and SSILF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (ARHS: $9.58 vs. SSILF: $0.14)
Brand notoriety: ARHS and SSILF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARHS: 83% vs. SSILF: 4%
Market capitalization -- ARHS: $2.18B vs. SSILF: $565.14M
ARHS [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $2.18B. SSILF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $565.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARHS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSSILF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ARHS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SSILF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SSILF is a better buy in the long-term than ARHS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ARHS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ARHS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

ARHS (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -1.24% price change this week, while SSILF (@Specialty Stores) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

ARHS is expected to report earnings on Mar 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-2.09% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ARHS($2.18B) has a higher market cap than SSILF($565M). SSILF has higher P/E ratio than ARHS: SSILF (97.09) vs ARHS (17.43). SSILF YTD gains are higher at: 10.308 vs. ARHS (-16.339). ARHS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 227M vs. SSILF (4.74M). SSILF has more cash in the bank: 303M vs. ARHS (223M). ARHS has less debt than SSILF: ARHS (463M) vs SSILF (596M). SSILF has higher revenues than ARHS: SSILF (3.5B) vs ARHS (1.29B).
ARHSSSILFARHS / SSILF
Capitalization2.18B565M385%
EBITDA227M4.74M4,790%
Gain YTD-16.33910.308-159%
P/E Ratio17.4397.0918%
Revenue1.29B3.5B37%
Total Cash223M303M74%
Total Debt463M596M78%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARHS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ARHS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

ARHS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARHS has been loosely correlated with CARS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ARHS jumps, then CARS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARHS
1D Price
Change %
ARHS100%
-1.14%
CARS - ARHS
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
RH - ARHS
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.14%
FND - ARHS
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
KMX - ARHS
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
AN - ARHS
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
More

SSILF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SSILF and WINH have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SSILF and WINH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSILF
1D Price
Change %
SSILF100%
N/A
WINH - SSILF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GHST - SSILF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARHS - SSILF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.14%
TKLF - SSILF
2%
Poorly correlated
+17.33%
ZHSHF - SSILF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More