ARHS
Price
$8.73
Change
+$0.03 (+0.34%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
2.18B
39 days until earnings call
FND
Price
$75.30
Change
-$0.48 (-0.63%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
13.87B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ARHS vs FND

Header iconARHS vs FND Comparison
Open Charts ARHS vs FNDBanner chart's image
Arhaus
Price$8.73
Change+$0.03 (+0.34%)
Volume$1.01M
Capitalization2.18B
Floor & Decor Holdings
Price$75.30
Change-$0.48 (-0.63%)
Volume$2.67M
Capitalization13.87B
ARHS vs FND Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ARHS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ARHS vs. FND commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARHS is a Buy and FND is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (ARHS: $8.73 vs. FND: $75.30)
Brand notoriety: ARHS and FND are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARHS: 65% vs. FND: 126%
Market capitalization -- ARHS: $2.18B vs. FND: $13.87B
ARHS [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $2.18B. FND’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $13.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARHS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFND’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ARHS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ARHS is a better buy in the long-term than FND.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ARHS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FND’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ARHS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FND’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ARHS is a better buy in the short-term than FND.

Price Growth

ARHS (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +2.59% price change this week, while FND (@Specialty Stores) price change was -0.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +2.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

ARHS is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

FND is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+2.51% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FND($13.9B) has a higher market cap than ARHS($2.18B). FND has higher P/E ratio than ARHS: FND (55.57) vs ARHS (17.43). ARHS YTD gains are higher at: -7.128 vs. FND (-24.473). FND has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 523M vs. ARHS (227M). ARHS has more cash in the bank: 223M vs. FND (34.4M). ARHS has less debt than FND: ARHS (463M) vs FND (1.63B). FND has higher revenues than ARHS: FND (4.41B) vs ARHS (1.29B).
ARHSFNDARHS / FND
Capitalization2.18B13.9B16%
EBITDA227M523M43%
Gain YTD-7.128-24.47329%
P/E Ratio17.4355.5731%
Revenue1.29B4.41B29%
Total Cash223M34.4M648%
Total Debt463M1.63B28%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FND: Fundamental Ratings
FND
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
11
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
74
SMR RATING
1..100
69
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
74
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARHSFND
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ARHS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JPUS117.600.24
+0.21%
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Eq ETF
PBFB28.48N/A
N/A
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - Feb
LFAU156.35N/A
N/A
LifeX 2058 Longevity Income ETF
XOP127.20-0.58
-0.45%
SPDR® S&P Oil & Gas Explor & Prodtn ETF
EMXF42.62-0.22
-0.51%
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF

ARHS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARHS has been loosely correlated with WSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ARHS jumps, then WSM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARHS
1D Price
Change %
ARHS100%
+0.34%
WSM - ARHS
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
RH - ARHS
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.10%
CARS - ARHS
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.42%
FND - ARHS
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
CWH - ARHS
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.74%
More

FND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FND has been closely correlated with LOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FND jumps, then LOW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FND
1D Price
Change %
FND100%
-0.63%
LOW - FND
69%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
WSM - FND
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
HD - FND
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.44%
RH - FND
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.10%
ASO - FND
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.77%
More