ARES
Price
$148.40
Change
-$5.29 (-3.44%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
32.71B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OWL
Price
$14.82
Change
-$0.26 (-1.72%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
9.85B
96 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ARES vs OWL

Header iconARES vs OWL Comparison
Open Charts ARES vs OWLBanner chart's image
Ares Management
Price$148.40
Change-$5.29 (-3.44%)
Volume$24.5K
Capitalization32.71B
Blue Owl Capital
Price$14.82
Change-$0.26 (-1.72%)
Volume$14.64M
Capitalization9.85B
ARES vs OWL Comparison Chart in %
ARES
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OWL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ARES vs. OWL commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARES is a Hold and OWL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (ARES: $153.69 vs. OWL: $15.08)
Brand notoriety: ARES and OWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARES: 78% vs. OWL: 90%
Market capitalization -- ARES: $32.71B vs. OWL: $9.85B
ARES [@Investment Managers] is valued at $32.71B. OWL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $9.85B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $165.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARES’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOWL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ARES’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OWL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ARES is a better buy in the long-term than OWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ARES’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OWL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ARES’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OWL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OWL is a better buy in the short-term than ARES.

Price Growth

ARES (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.29% price change this week, while OWL (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

ARES is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

OWL is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.56% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ARES($32.7B) has a higher market cap than OWL($9.85B). OWL has higher P/E ratio than ARES: OWL (185.25) vs ARES (62.65). ARES YTD gains are higher at: -11.361 vs. OWL (-32.197). ARES has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.01B vs. OWL (780M). OWL has less debt than ARES: OWL (3.65B) vs ARES (13.5B). ARES has higher revenues than OWL: ARES (4.83B) vs OWL (2.75B).
ARESOWLARES / OWL
Capitalization32.7B9.85B332%
EBITDA2.01B780M258%
Gain YTD-11.361-32.19735%
P/E Ratio62.65185.2534%
Revenue4.83B2.75B176%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt13.5B3.65B370%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ARES: Fundamental Ratings
ARES
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
19
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
32
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
33

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARESOWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
60%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ARES
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OWL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AHLT25.960.31
+1.20%
American Beacon AHL Trend ETF
EDGH30.180.34
+1.14%
3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF
MUE10.150.05
+0.50%
Blackrock Muniholdings Quality Fund II
IBUF28.870.08
+0.26%
Innovator Intl Dev 10 Buffr ETF-Qt
TMSL35.300.01
+0.02%
T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF

ARES and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARES has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ARES jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARES
1D Price
Change %
ARES100%
-0.12%
KKR - ARES
87%
Closely correlated
+1.41%
OWL - ARES
87%
Closely correlated
N/A
CG - ARES
83%
Closely correlated
+2.17%
TPG - ARES
82%
Closely correlated
+2.84%
APO - ARES
81%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
More

OWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OWL has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OWL jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OWL
1D Price
Change %
OWL100%
N/A
ARES - OWL
87%
Closely correlated
-0.12%
KKR - OWL
86%
Closely correlated
+1.41%
APO - OWL
82%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
CG - OWL
82%
Closely correlated
+2.17%
TPG - OWL
81%
Closely correlated
+2.84%
More