ARES
Price
$131.52
Change
-$15.74 (-10.69%)
Updated
Feb 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
32.27B
2 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OWL
Price
$12.11
Change
-$4.15 (-25.54%)
Updated
Feb 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.92B
2 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ARES vs OWL

Header iconARES vs OWL Comparison
Open Charts ARES vs OWLBanner chart's image
Ares Management
Price$131.52
Change-$15.74 (-10.69%)
Volume$51.27K
Capitalization32.27B
Blue Owl Capital
Price$12.11
Change-$4.15 (-25.54%)
Volume$508.05K
Capitalization8.92B
ARES vs OWL Comparison Chart in %
ARES
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OWL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ARES vs. OWL commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARES is a Hold and OWL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (ARES: $146.47 vs. OWL: $13.42)
Brand notoriety: ARES and OWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARES: 107% vs. OWL: 199%
Market capitalization -- ARES: $32.27B vs. OWL: $8.92B
ARES [@Investment Managers] is valued at $32.27B. OWL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $8.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $173.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARES’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOWL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ARES’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OWL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ARES is a better buy in the long-term than OWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ARES’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OWL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ARES’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OWL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ARES is a better buy in the short-term than OWL.

Price Growth

ARES (@Investment Managers) experienced а -2.15% price change this week, while OWL (@Investment Managers) price change was -8.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

ARES is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

OWL is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.00% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ARES($32.3B) has a higher market cap than OWL($8.92B). OWL has higher P/E ratio than ARES: OWL (167.75) vs ARES (61.80). ARES YTD gains are higher at: -9.379 vs. OWL (-10.174). ARES has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.31B vs. OWL (780M). OWL has less debt than ARES: OWL (3.78B) vs ARES (12.7B). ARES has higher revenues than OWL: ARES (5.36B) vs OWL (2.75B).
ARESOWLARES / OWL
Capitalization32.3B8.92B362%
EBITDA2.31B780M296%
Gain YTD-9.379-10.17492%
P/E Ratio61.80167.7537%
Revenue5.36B2.75B195%
Total CashN/A137M-
Total Debt12.7B3.78B336%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ARES: Fundamental Ratings
ARES
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
55
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
38
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
83
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARESOWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ARES
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OWL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NOWL8.150.17
+2.13%
GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF
MSFD13.030.21
+1.64%
Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X ETF
IMTM51.090.40
+0.79%
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
DDLS44.860.17
+0.38%
WisdomTree Dynamic Intl SmCap Eq ETF
CCIF4.07-0.45
-9.96%
Carlyle Credit Income Fund

ARES and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARES has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ARES jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARES
1D Price
Change %
ARES100%
-2.14%
KKR - ARES
86%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
OWL - ARES
86%
Closely correlated
-1.61%
TPG - ARES
83%
Closely correlated
-1.17%
APO - ARES
81%
Closely correlated
-1.00%
CG - ARES
81%
Closely correlated
+2.69%
More

OWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OWL has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OWL jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OWL
1D Price
Change %
OWL100%
-1.61%
ARES - OWL
86%
Closely correlated
-2.14%
KKR - OWL
84%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
APO - OWL
81%
Closely correlated
-1.00%
BX - OWL
81%
Closely correlated
-0.80%
CG - OWL
80%
Closely correlated
+2.69%
More