ARCC
Price
$21.58
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
81 days until earnings call
BRSGF
Price
$0.51
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Ad is loading...

ARCC vs BRSGF

Header iconARCC vs BRSGF Comparison
Open Charts ARCC vs BRSGFBanner chart's image
Ares Capital
Price$21.58
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.69M
CapitalizationN/A
Queens Rd Cap Invt
Price$0.51
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2K
CapitalizationN/A
ARCC vs BRSGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ARCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ARCC vs. BRSGF commentary
Nov 16, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARCC is a Buy and BRSGF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 16, 2024
Stock price -- (ARCC: $21.58 vs. BRSGF: $0.51)
Brand notoriety: ARCC: Notable vs. BRSGF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARCC: 113% vs. BRSGF: 247%
Market capitalization -- ARCC: $12.63B vs. BRSGF: $224.46M
ARCC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $12.63B. BRSGF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $224.46M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARCC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileBRSGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ARCC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • BRSGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ARCC is a better buy in the long-term than BRSGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ARCC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ARCC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

ARCC (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.17% price change this week, while BRSGF (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

ARCC is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.71% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ARCC($12.6B) has a higher market cap than BRSGF($224M). ARCC has higher P/E ratio than BRSGF: ARCC (7.61) vs BRSGF (3.33). ARCC YTD gains are higher at: 15.513 vs. BRSGF (-7.091). BRSGF has less debt than ARCC: BRSGF (367K) vs ARCC (11.9B). ARCC has higher revenues than BRSGF: ARCC (1.64B) vs BRSGF (-26.62M).
ARCCBRSGFARCC / BRSGF
Capitalization12.6B224M5,625%
EBITDAN/A-30.08M-
Gain YTD15.513-7.091-219%
P/E Ratio7.613.33228%
Revenue1.64B-26.62M-6,146%
Total CashN/A12.9M-
Total Debt11.9B367K3,242,507%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ARCC vs BRSGF: Fundamental Ratings
ARCC
BRSGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7893
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2164
SMR RATING
1..100
1093
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5060
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6999
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ARCC's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as BRSGF (18). This means that ARCC’s stock grew similarly to BRSGF’s over the last 12 months.

ARCC's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BRSGF (64). This means that ARCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BRSGF’s over the last 12 months.

ARCC's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BRSGF (93). This means that ARCC’s stock grew significantly faster than BRSGF’s over the last 12 months.

ARCC's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as BRSGF (60). This means that ARCC’s stock grew similarly to BRSGF’s over the last 12 months.

ARCC's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as BRSGF (99). This means that ARCC’s stock grew similarly to BRSGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARCC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ARCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

ARCC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARCC has been closely correlated with MAIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ARCC jumps, then MAIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARCC
1D Price
Change %
ARCC100%
+0.19%
MAIN - ARCC
67%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
FSK - ARCC
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
BXSL - ARCC
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
HTGC - ARCC
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
TSLX - ARCC
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
More

BRSGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRSGF has been loosely correlated with HTGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRSGF jumps, then HTGC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRSGF
1D Price
Change %
BRSGF100%
N/A
HTGC - BRSGF
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
MAIN - BRSGF
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
APO - BRSGF
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.02%
PNNT - BRSGF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
ARCC - BRSGF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
More