ARAFF
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
351.16M
FLMCF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.03 (-50.00%)
Updated
Jul 14 closing price
Capitalization
4.49M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ARAFF vs FLMCF

Header iconARAFF vs FLMCF Comparison
Open Charts ARAFF vs FLMCFBanner chart's image
Arafura Resources NL
Price$0.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$11.22K
Capitalization351.16M
First Lithium Minerals
Price$0.03
Change-$0.03 (-50.00%)
Volume$1.4K
Capitalization4.49M
ARAFF vs FLMCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ARAFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ARAFF vs. FLMCF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARAFF is a Hold and FLMCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (ARAFF: $0.13 vs. FLMCF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: ARAFF and FLMCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARAFF: 3% vs. FLMCF: 67%
Market capitalization -- ARAFF: $351.16M vs. FLMCF: $4.49M
ARAFF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $351.16M. FLMCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $4.49M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARAFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFLMCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ARAFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FLMCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ARAFF is a better buy in the long-term than FLMCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ARAFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLMCF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ARAFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FLMCF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLMCF is a better buy in the short-term than ARAFF.

Price Growth

ARAFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -0.51% price change this week, while FLMCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ARAFF($351M) has a higher market cap than FLMCF($4.49M). ARAFF YTD gains are higher at: 84.771 vs. FLMCF (-43.973).
ARAFFFLMCFARAFF / FLMCF
Capitalization351M4.49M7,817%
EBITDAN/A-1.13M-
Gain YTD84.771-43.973-193%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A1.73M-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ARAFF: Fundamental Ratings
ARAFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
83
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARAFFFLMCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
82%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
85%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ARAFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NOSGX14.040.04
+0.29%
Northern Small Cap Value
LGLFX57.230.10
+0.18%
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders F
CMCIX27.070.02
+0.07%
Calvert Small/Mid-Cap I
ILGCX23.20N/A
N/A
Columbia Integrated Large Cap Gr A
WOFDX62.91-0.13
-0.21%
Allspring Opportunity Admin

ARAFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ARAFF and AZMTF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ARAFF and AZMTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARAFF
1D Price
Change %
ARAFF100%
+1.05%
AZMTF - ARAFF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.88%
ULTHF - ARAFF
24%
Poorly correlated
-8.36%
ADBRF - ARAFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.44%
FLMCF - ARAFF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLVDF - ARAFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.75%
More

FLMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FLMCF and EUEMF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLMCF and EUEMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLMCF
1D Price
Change %
FLMCF100%
N/A
EUEMF - FLMCF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JUBPF - FLMCF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMGDF - FLMCF
25%
Poorly correlated
-4.19%
ARAFF - FLMCF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
GIGGF - FLMCF
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.61%
More