Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AQWA vs PHO
AQWA vs PHO Comparison
Open Charts AQWA vs PHO
Global X Clean Water ETF
Price$20.14
Change+$0.24 (+1.21%)
Volume$123
Net Assets27.63M
Invesco Water Resources ETF
Price$73.01
Change+$0.73 (+1.01%)
Volume$321
Net Assets2.14B
AQWA vs PHO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AQWA vs. PHO commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AQWA is a Buy and PHO is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PHO has more net assets: 2.14B vs. AQWA (27.6M). AQWA has a higher annual dividend yield than PHO: AQWA (6.032) vs PHO (2.657). AQWA was incepted earlier than PHO: AQWA (5 years) vs PHO (20 years). AQWA (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than PHO (0.59). PHO has a higher turnover AQWA (10.48) vs AQWA (10.48).
| AQWA | PHO | AQWA / PHO | |
| Gain YTD | 6.032 | 2.657 | 227% |
| Net Assets | 27.6M | 2.14B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.59 | 85% |
| Turnover | 10.48 | 25.00 | 42% |
| Yield | 1.39 | 0.53 | 265% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AQWA | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 84% | 14 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 78% | 8 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
AQWA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AQWA has been loosely correlated with CNM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AQWA jumps, then CNM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AQWA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQWA | 100% | -0.59% | ||
| CNM - AQWA | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.19% | ||
| HTO - AQWA | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| WTTR - AQWA | 29% Poorly correlated | +2.60% | ||
| YORW - AQWA | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.63% | ||
| AOS - AQWA | 25% Poorly correlated | +2.18% | ||
More | ||||
PHO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHO has been closely correlated with PNR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PHO jumps, then PNR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PHO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHO | 100% | -1.26% | ||
| PNR - PHO | 83% Closely correlated | -10.16% | ||
| FELE - PHO | 79% Closely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| WTS - PHO | 79% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| FERG - PHO | 73% Closely correlated | +1.06% | ||
| ACM - PHO | 73% Closely correlated | -1.34% | ||
More | ||||