Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AQWA vs LIT
AQWA vs LIT Comparison
Open Charts AQWA vs LIT
Global X Clean Water ETF
Price$19.20
Change-$0.05 (-0.26%)
Volume$4.63K
Net Assets20.46M
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$67.89
Change+$0.79 (+1.18%)
Volume$260.42K
Net Assets1.53B
AQWA vs LIT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AQWA vs. LIT commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AQWA is a Buy and LIT is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIT has more net assets: 1.53B vs. AQWA (20.5M). LIT has a higher annual dividend yield than AQWA: LIT (67.069) vs AQWA (14.739). AQWA was incepted earlier than LIT: AQWA (5 years) vs LIT (15 years). AQWA (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than LIT (0.75). LIT has a higher turnover AQWA (10.48) vs AQWA (10.48).
| AQWA | LIT | AQWA / LIT | |
| Gain YTD | 14.739 | 67.069 | 22% |
| Net Assets | 20.5M | 1.53B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.75 | 67% |
| Turnover | 10.48 | 22.87 | 46% |
| Yield | 1.33 | 0.42 | 313% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AQWA | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 79% | 13 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
AQWA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AQWA has been loosely correlated with HTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AQWA jumps, then HTO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AQWA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQWA | 100% | -0.23% | ||
| HTO - AQWA | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.15% | ||
| CNM - AQWA | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| WTTR - AQWA | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.09% | ||
| YORW - AQWA | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.80% | ||
| AOS - AQWA | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.29% | ||
More | ||||
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | +1.18% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 73% Closely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 72% Closely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 58% Loosely correlated | +7.33% | ||
| LAR - LIT | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| RIVN - LIT | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.09% | ||
More | ||||