Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AQWA vs CUT
AQWA vs CUT Comparison
Open Charts AQWA vs CUT
Global X Clean Water ETF
Price$19.05
Change-$0.07 (-0.37%)
Volume$938
Net Assets11.78M
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$31.18
Change-$0.19 (-0.61%)
Volume$837
Net Assets48.55M
AQWA vs CUT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AQWA vs. CUT commentary
Jul 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AQWA is a Hold and CUT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CUT has more net assets: 48.5M vs. AQWA (11.8M). AQWA has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: AQWA (13.813) vs CUT (-1.522). AQWA was incepted earlier than CUT: AQWA (4 years) vs CUT (18 years). AQWA (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). CUT has a higher turnover AQWA (10.48) vs AQWA (10.48).
| AQWA | CUT | AQWA / CUT | |
| Gain YTD | 13.813 | -1.522 | -907% |
| Net Assets | 11.8M | 48.5M | 24% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.74 | 68% |
| Turnover | 10.48 | 32.00 | 33% |
| Yield | 1.36 | 3.21 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AQWA | CUT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 11 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
AQWA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AQWA has been closely correlated with PNR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AQWA jumps, then PNR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AQWA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQWA | 100% | -0.39% | ||
| PNR - AQWA | 73% Closely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| XYL - AQWA | 71% Closely correlated | -0.40% | ||
| WTS - AQWA | 69% Closely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| WTRG - AQWA | 69% Closely correlated | -1.41% | ||
| AWK - AQWA | 69% Closely correlated | -0.97% | ||
More | ||||
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CUT has been loosely correlated with AMCR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CUT jumps, then AMCR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | -0.58% | ||
| AMCR - CUT | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| WFG - CUT | 55% Loosely correlated | -5.95% | ||
| SLVM - CUT | 54% Loosely correlated | -2.14% | ||
| MAGN - CUT | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.04% | ||
| PACK - CUT | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.27% | ||
More | ||||