Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AQWA vs CUT
AQWA vs CUT Comparison
Open Charts AQWA vs CUT
Global X Clean Water ETF
Price$18.87
Change-$0.14 (-0.74%)
Volume$1.04K
Net Assets11.25M
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$30.22
Change+$0.08 (+0.27%)
Volume$1.87K
Net Assets46.16M
AQWA vs CUT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AQWA vs. CUT commentary
Jun 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AQWA is a StrongBuy and CUT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CUT has more net assets: 46.2M vs. AQWA (11.3M). AQWA has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: AQWA (12.761) vs CUT (-4.554). AQWA was incepted earlier than CUT: AQWA (4 years) vs CUT (18 years). AQWA (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). CUT has a higher turnover AQWA (10.48) vs AQWA (10.48).
| AQWA | CUT | AQWA / CUT | |
| Gain YTD | 12.761 | -4.554 | -280% |
| Net Assets | 11.3M | 46.2M | 24% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.74 | 68% |
| Turnover | 10.48 | 32.00 | 33% |
| Yield | 1.28 | 3.17 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AQWA | CUT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
AQWA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AQWA has been closely correlated with PNR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AQWA jumps, then PNR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AQWA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQWA | 100% | -0.17% | ||
| PNR - AQWA | 73% Closely correlated | +0.92% | ||
| XYL - AQWA | 71% Closely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| WTS - AQWA | 69% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| WTRG - AQWA | 69% Closely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| AWK - AQWA | 69% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
More | ||||
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CUT has been loosely correlated with AMCR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CUT jumps, then AMCR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | +0.28% | ||
| AMCR - CUT | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| WFG - CUT | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.63% | ||
| SLVM - CUT | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| MAGN - CUT | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| PACK - CUT | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
More | ||||