Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AQWA vs CUT
AQWA vs CUT Comparison
Open Charts AQWA vs CUT
Global X Clean Water ETF
Price$20.14
Change+$0.24 (+1.21%)
Volume$123
Net Assets27.63M
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$30.91
Change+$1.07 (+3.59%)
Volume$217
Net Assets37.19M
AQWA vs CUT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AQWA vs. CUT commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AQWA is a Buy and CUT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CUT has more net assets: 37.2M vs. AQWA (27.6M). AQWA has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: AQWA (6.032) vs CUT (2.691). AQWA was incepted earlier than CUT: AQWA (5 years) vs CUT (18 years). AQWA (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). CUT has a higher turnover AQWA (10.48) vs AQWA (10.48).
| AQWA | CUT | AQWA / CUT | |
| Gain YTD | 6.032 | 2.691 | 224% |
| Net Assets | 27.6M | 37.2M | 74% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.74 | 68% |
| Turnover | 10.48 | 26.00 | 40% |
| Yield | 1.39 | 2.40 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AQWA | CUT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
AQWA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AQWA has been loosely correlated with CNM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AQWA jumps, then CNM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AQWA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQWA | 100% | -0.59% | ||
| CNM - AQWA | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.19% | ||
| HTO - AQWA | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| WTTR - AQWA | 29% Poorly correlated | +2.60% | ||
| YORW - AQWA | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.63% | ||
| AOS - AQWA | 25% Poorly correlated | +2.18% | ||
More | ||||
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CUT has been loosely correlated with SLVM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CUT jumps, then SLVM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | +0.10% | ||
| SLVM - CUT | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| PACK - CUT | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| SEM - CUT | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IP - CUT | 6% Poorly correlated | +3.37% | ||
| CLW - CUT | 4% Poorly correlated | -3.97% | ||
More | ||||