AQMS
Price
$7.30
Change
+$2.38 (+48.37%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
10.26M
LNZA
Price
$23.52
Change
+$2.51 (+11.95%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
54.58M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AQMS vs LNZA

Header iconAQMS vs LNZA Comparison
Open Charts AQMS vs LNZABanner chart's image
Aqua Metals
Price$7.30
Change+$2.38 (+48.37%)
Volume$26.94M
Capitalization10.26M
LanzaTech Global
Price$23.52
Change+$2.51 (+11.95%)
Volume$38.44K
Capitalization54.58M
AQMS vs LNZA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AQMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LNZA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AQMS vs. LNZA commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AQMS is a Buy and LNZA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (AQMS: $7.30 vs. LNZA: $23.52)
Brand notoriety: AQMS and LNZA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AQMS: 2545% vs. LNZA: 142%
Market capitalization -- AQMS: $10.26M vs. LNZA: $54.58M
AQMS [@Environmental Services] is valued at $10.26M. LNZA’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $54.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $88.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AQMS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLNZA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AQMS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LNZA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LNZA is a better buy in the long-term than AQMS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AQMS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LNZA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AQMS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LNZA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LNZA is a better buy in the short-term than AQMS.

Price Growth

AQMS (@Environmental Services) experienced а +77.18% price change this week, while LNZA (@Environmental Services) price change was +34.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +1.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+1.61% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LNZA($54.6M) has a higher market cap than AQMS($10.3M). AQMS YTD gains are higher at: -71.032 vs. LNZA (-82.828). AQMS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -25.52M vs. LNZA (-118.83M). LNZA has more cash in the bank: 37.4M vs. AQMS (1.93M). AQMS has less debt than LNZA: AQMS (593K) vs LNZA (36.2M). LNZA has higher revenues than AQMS: LNZA (40.5M) vs AQMS (0).
AQMSLNZAAQMS / LNZA
Capitalization10.3M54.6M19%
EBITDA-25.52M-118.83M21%
Gain YTD-71.032-82.82886%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue040.5M-
Total Cash1.93M37.4M5%
Total Debt593K36.2M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AQMS: Fundamental Ratings
AQMS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AQMSLNZA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AQMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LNZA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VINZF0.070.01
+17.65%
London BTC Company Limited
RXEEY32.191.04
+3.35%
Rexel SA
ECSNF3.04N/A
N/A
Ecosynthetix, Inc.
FRCEF1.61N/A
N/A
Fletcher Building Ltd.
CTSUF12.29N/A
N/A
Cactus Acquisition Corp. 1 Limited

AQMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AQMS and ABAT have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AQMS and ABAT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AQMS
1D Price
Change %
AQMS100%
+48.37%
ABAT - AQMS
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
CLH - AQMS
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
LNZA - AQMS
16%
Poorly correlated
+11.97%
GWAV - AQMS
15%
Poorly correlated
+5.11%
QRHC - AQMS
13%
Poorly correlated
+3.85%
More

LNZA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LNZA and ABAT have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LNZA and ABAT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNZA
1D Price
Change %
LNZA100%
+11.97%
ABAT - LNZA
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
QRHC - LNZA
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.85%
CLH - LNZA
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
PESI - LNZA
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.22%
CWST - LNZA
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.55%
More