AQMS
Price
$4.06
Change
-$0.11 (-2.64%)
Updated
Sep 8, 12:30 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.86M
CWSFF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
7.59M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AQMS vs CWSFF

Header iconAQMS vs CWSFF Comparison
Open Charts AQMS vs CWSFFBanner chart's image
Aqua Metals
Price$4.06
Change-$0.11 (-2.64%)
Volume$100
Capitalization5.86M
CIELO WASTE SOLUTIONS
Price$0.04
Change-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Volume$20.26K
Capitalization7.59M
AQMS vs CWSFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AQMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CWSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AQMS vs. CWSFF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AQMS is a Hold and CWSFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (AQMS: $4.17 vs. CWSFF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: AQMS and CWSFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AQMS: 13% vs. CWSFF: 65%
Market capitalization -- AQMS: $5.86M vs. CWSFF: $7.59M
AQMS [@Environmental Services] is valued at $5.86M. CWSFF’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $7.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $88.65B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AQMS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCWSFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AQMS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CWSFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AQMS and CWSFF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AQMS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CWSFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AQMS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CWSFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AQMS and CWSFF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AQMS (@Environmental Services) experienced а +9.16% price change this week, while CWSFF (@Environmental Services) price change was -8.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.61%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+0.77% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWSFF($7.59M) has a higher market cap than AQMS($5.86M). CWSFF YTD gains are higher at: -46.247 vs. AQMS (-83.452). AQMS has less debt than CWSFF: AQMS (593K) vs CWSFF (2.4M).
AQMSCWSFFAQMS / CWSFF
Capitalization5.86M7.59M77%
EBITDAN/A-39.82M-
Gain YTD-83.452-46.247180%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A67K-
Total Debt593K2.4M25%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AQMS vs CWSFF: Fundamental Ratings
AQMS
CWSFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6564
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AQMS's Valuation (97) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as CWSFF (98) in the null industry. This means that AQMS’s stock grew similarly to CWSFF’s over the last 12 months.

AQMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as CWSFF (100) in the null industry. This means that AQMS’s stock grew similarly to CWSFF’s over the last 12 months.

CWSFF's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as AQMS (100) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that CWSFF’s stock grew similarly to AQMS’s over the last 12 months.

CWSFF's Price Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as AQMS (65) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that CWSFF’s stock grew similarly to AQMS’s over the last 12 months.

CWSFF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as AQMS (100) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that CWSFF’s stock grew similarly to AQMS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AQMSCWSFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AQMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CWSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GGB3.200.12
+3.90%
Gerdau SA
TG7.840.12
+1.55%
Tredegar Corp
BX169.990.09
+0.05%
Blackstone
AXIL5.57-0.03
-0.48%
AXIL Brands
CRAI194.24-2.44
-1.24%
CRA International

AQMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AQMS and ABAT have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AQMS and ABAT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AQMS
1D Price
Change %
AQMS100%
+8.59%
ABAT - AQMS
19%
Poorly correlated
-4.38%
GWAV - AQMS
18%
Poorly correlated
-2.58%
CLH - AQMS
17%
Poorly correlated
-3.62%
LNZA - AQMS
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.75%
QRHC - AQMS
14%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
More

CWSFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CWSFF and CTRNF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CWSFF and CTRNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWSFF
1D Price
Change %
CWSFF100%
-25.97%
CTRNF - CWSFF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHFFY - CWSFF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTQNF - CWSFF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
QRHC - CWSFF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
AQMS - CWSFF
2%
Poorly correlated
+8.59%
More