AQMS
Price
$3.89
Change
-$0.10 (-2.51%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
3.87M
CWSFF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
5.16M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AQMS vs CWSFF

Header iconAQMS vs CWSFF Comparison
Open Charts AQMS vs CWSFFBanner chart's image
Aqua Metals
Price$3.89
Change-$0.10 (-2.51%)
Volume$27.31K
Capitalization3.87M
CIELO WASTE SOLUTIONS
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.03K
Capitalization5.16M
AQMS vs CWSFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AQMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CWSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AQMS vs. CWSFF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AQMS is a Hold and CWSFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (AQMS: $3.89 vs. CWSFF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: AQMS and CWSFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AQMS: 9% vs. CWSFF: 24%
Market capitalization -- AQMS: $3.87M vs. CWSFF: $5.16M
AQMS [@Environmental Services] is valued at $3.87M. CWSFF’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $5.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $91.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AQMS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCWSFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AQMS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CWSFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CWSFF is a better buy in the long-term than AQMS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AQMS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CWSFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AQMS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CWSFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AQMS is a better buy in the short-term than CWSFF.

Price Growth

AQMS (@Environmental Services) experienced а +5.14% price change this week, while CWSFF (@Environmental Services) price change was -8.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.79%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+1.25% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWSFF($5.16M) has a higher market cap than AQMS($3.87M). CWSFF YTD gains are higher at: -41.488 vs. AQMS (-84.563). CWSFF has less debt than AQMS: CWSFF (2.4M) vs AQMS (3.93M).
AQMSCWSFFAQMS / CWSFF
Capitalization3.87M5.16M75%
EBITDAN/A-39.82M-
Gain YTD-84.563-41.488204%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A67K-
Total Debt3.93M2.4M164%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AQMS vs CWSFF: Fundamental Ratings
AQMS
CWSFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
497
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9999
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9748
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AQMS's Valuation (97) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as CWSFF (98) in the null industry. This means that AQMS’s stock grew similarly to CWSFF’s over the last 12 months.

AQMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as CWSFF (100) in the null industry. This means that AQMS’s stock grew similarly to CWSFF’s over the last 12 months.

AQMS's SMR Rating (99) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as CWSFF (99) in the null industry. This means that AQMS’s stock grew similarly to CWSFF’s over the last 12 months.

CWSFF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AQMS (97) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that CWSFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AQMS’s over the last 12 months.

CWSFF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as AQMS (100) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that CWSFF’s stock grew similarly to AQMS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AQMSCWSFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AQMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CWSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CCK101.08N/A
N/A
Crown Holdings
SB4.25-0.02
-0.47%
Safe Bulkers
HCI156.19-1.04
-0.66%
HCI Group
SHPH3.32-0.18
-5.14%
Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings Inc
YYGH1.89-0.35
-15.63%
YY Group Holding Limited

AQMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AQMS and ABAT have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AQMS and ABAT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AQMS
1D Price
Change %
AQMS100%
-2.51%
ABAT - AQMS
18%
Poorly correlated
+1.84%
CLH - AQMS
17%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
GWAV - AQMS
17%
Poorly correlated
-1.28%
LNZA - AQMS
17%
Poorly correlated
-30.55%
QRHC - AQMS
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
More

CWSFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CWSFF and CTRNF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CWSFF and CTRNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWSFF
1D Price
Change %
CWSFF100%
+0.11%
CTRNF - CWSFF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHFFY - CWSFF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTQNF - CWSFF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
QRHC - CWSFF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
AQMS - CWSFF
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.51%
More