AQMS
Price
$4.06
Change
-$0.11 (-2.64%)
Updated
Sep 8, 12:30 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.86M
CLH
Price
$236.15
Change
-$0.10 (-0.04%)
Updated
Sep 8, 12:41 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.67B
51 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AQMS vs CLH

Header iconAQMS vs CLH Comparison
Open Charts AQMS vs CLHBanner chart's image
Aqua Metals
Price$4.06
Change-$0.11 (-2.64%)
Volume$100
Capitalization5.86M
Clean Harbors
Price$236.15
Change-$0.10 (-0.04%)
Volume$100
Capitalization12.67B
AQMS vs CLH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AQMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AQMS vs. CLH commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AQMS is a Hold and CLH is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (AQMS: $4.17 vs. CLH: $236.25)
Brand notoriety: AQMS and CLH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AQMS: 13% vs. CLH: 233%
Market capitalization -- AQMS: $5.86M vs. CLH: $12.67B
AQMS [@Environmental Services] is valued at $5.86M. CLH’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $12.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $88.65B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AQMS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AQMS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CLH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLH is a better buy in the long-term than AQMS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AQMS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AQMS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CLH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AQMS is a better buy in the short-term than CLH.

Price Growth

AQMS (@Environmental Services) experienced а +9.16% price change this week, while CLH (@Environmental Services) price change was -2.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +0.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLH is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+0.39% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLH($12.7B) has a higher market cap than AQMS($5.86M). CLH YTD gains are higher at: 2.655 vs. AQMS (-83.452). AQMS has less debt than CLH: AQMS (593K) vs CLH (3.03B).
AQMSCLHAQMS / CLH
Capitalization5.86M12.7B0%
EBITDAN/A1.11B-
Gain YTD-83.4522.655-3,143%
P/E RatioN/A33.23-
RevenueN/A5.94B-
Total CashN/A699M-
Total Debt593K3.03B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AQMS vs CLH: Fundamental Ratings
AQMS
CLH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10019
SMR RATING
1..100
10054
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6554
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10048
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9040

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLH's Valuation (81) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as AQMS (97). This means that CLH’s stock grew similarly to AQMS’s over the last 12 months.

CLH's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Environmental Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for AQMS (100). This means that CLH’s stock grew significantly faster than AQMS’s over the last 12 months.

CLH's SMR Rating (54) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AQMS (100). This means that CLH’s stock grew somewhat faster than AQMS’s over the last 12 months.

CLH's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as AQMS (65). This means that CLH’s stock grew similarly to AQMS’s over the last 12 months.

CLH's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AQMS (100). This means that CLH’s stock grew somewhat faster than AQMS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AQMSCLH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AQMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IMST37.550.78
+2.13%
Bitwise Mstr Option Income Strategy ETF
PFIG24.330.07
+0.27%
Invesco Fdmtl Invmt Grd Corp Bd ETF
EPP51.420.11
+0.21%
iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF
HART30.67N/A
N/A
IQ Healthy Hearts ETF
DDEC43.07-0.02
-0.06%
FT Vest US Equity Dp Bfr ETF Dec

AQMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AQMS and ABAT have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AQMS and ABAT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AQMS
1D Price
Change %
AQMS100%
+8.59%
ABAT - AQMS
19%
Poorly correlated
-4.38%
GWAV - AQMS
18%
Poorly correlated
-2.58%
CLH - AQMS
17%
Poorly correlated
-3.62%
LNZA - AQMS
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.75%
QRHC - AQMS
14%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
More

CLH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLH has been loosely correlated with NVRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLH jumps, then NVRI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLH
1D Price
Change %
CLH100%
-3.62%
NVRI - CLH
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
CWST - CLH
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
WM - CLH
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.17%
WCN - CLH
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.09%
RSG - CLH
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.76%
More