Advertisement
AQMS vs CLH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AQMS is a Hold and CLH is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AQMS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AQMS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- CLH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AQMS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AQMS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- CLH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AQMS (@Environmental Services) experienced а +5.14% price change this week, while CLH (@Environmental Services) price change was +2.48% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.79%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLH is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Environmental Services (+1.25% weekly)Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.
| AQMS | CLH | AQMS / CLH | |
| Capitalization | 3.87M | 13B | 0% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 1.11B | - |
| Gain YTD | -84.563 | 5.644 | -1,498% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 34.20 | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 5.94B | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 699M | - |
| Total Debt | 3.93M | 3.03B | 0% |
AQMS | CLH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 97 Overvalued | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 17 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 55 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 44 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 12 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLH's Valuation (78) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as AQMS (97). This means that CLH’s stock grew similarly to AQMS’s over the last 12 months.
CLH's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Environmental Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for AQMS (100). This means that CLH’s stock grew significantly faster than AQMS’s over the last 12 months.
CLH's SMR Rating (55) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AQMS (99). This means that CLH’s stock grew somewhat faster than AQMS’s over the last 12 months.
CLH's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AQMS (97). This means that CLH’s stock grew somewhat faster than AQMS’s over the last 12 months.
CLH's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AQMS (100). This means that CLH’s stock grew somewhat faster than AQMS’s over the last 12 months.
| AQMS | CLH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 44% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 75% | 5 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 42% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 71% |
Advertisement
AQMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AQMS and ABAT have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AQMS and ABAT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AQMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQMS | 100% | -2.51% | ||
| ABAT - AQMS | 18% Poorly correlated | +1.84% | ||
| CLH - AQMS | 17% Poorly correlated | -1.59% | ||
| GWAV - AQMS | 17% Poorly correlated | -1.28% | ||
| LNZA - AQMS | 17% Poorly correlated | -30.55% | ||
| QRHC - AQMS | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.60% | ||
More | ||||
CLH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLH has been loosely correlated with NVRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLH jumps, then NVRI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLH | 100% | -1.59% | ||
| NVRI - CLH | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.98% | ||
| CWST - CLH | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| WM - CLH | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| WCN - CLH | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| RSG - CLH | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.15% | ||
More | ||||