AQMS
Price
$0.53
Change
-$0.03 (-5.36%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
79.15M
CLH
Price
$234.15
Change
+$3.81 (+1.65%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
10.63B
24 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AQMS vs CLH

Header iconAQMS vs CLH Comparison
Open Charts AQMS vs CLHBanner chart's image
Aqua Metals
Price$0.53
Change-$0.03 (-5.36%)
Volume$206.23K
Capitalization79.15M
Clean Harbors
Price$234.15
Change+$3.81 (+1.65%)
Volume$332.43K
Capitalization10.63B
AQMS vs CLH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AQMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AQMS vs. CLH commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AQMS is a Hold and CLH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (AQMS: $0.53 vs. CLH: $234.15)
Brand notoriety: AQMS and CLH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AQMS: 63% vs. CLH: 98%
Market capitalization -- AQMS: $79.15M vs. CLH: $10.63B
AQMS [@Environmental Services] is valued at $79.15M. CLH’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $10.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $85.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AQMS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AQMS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CLH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLH is a better buy in the long-term than AQMS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AQMS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AQMS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CLH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AQMS is a better buy in the short-term than CLH.

Price Growth

AQMS (@Environmental Services) experienced а -4.34% price change this week, while CLH (@Environmental Services) price change was +1.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLH is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (-1.64% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLH($10.6B) has a higher market cap than AQMS($79.2M). CLH YTD gains are higher at: 1.742 vs. AQMS (-79.159). CLH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 990M vs. AQMS (-16.17M). CLH has more cash in the bank: 551M vs. AQMS (25.6M). AQMS has less debt than CLH: AQMS (3.3M) vs CLH (2.49B). CLH has higher revenues than AQMS: CLH (5.41B) vs AQMS (25K).
AQMSCLHAQMS / CLH
Capitalization79.2M10.6B1%
EBITDA-16.17M990M-2%
Gain YTD-79.1591.742-4,543%
P/E RatioN/A28.35-
Revenue25K5.41B0%
Total Cash25.6M551M5%
Total Debt3.3M2.49B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AQMS vs CLH: Fundamental Ratings
AQMS
CLH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10018
SMR RATING
1..100
9953
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9750
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10058
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLH's Valuation (77) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as AQMS (95). This means that CLH’s stock grew similarly to AQMS’s over the last 12 months.

CLH's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Environmental Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for AQMS (100). This means that CLH’s stock grew significantly faster than AQMS’s over the last 12 months.

CLH's SMR Rating (53) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AQMS (99). This means that CLH’s stock grew somewhat faster than AQMS’s over the last 12 months.

CLH's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AQMS (97). This means that CLH’s stock grew somewhat faster than AQMS’s over the last 12 months.

CLH's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AQMS (100). This means that CLH’s stock grew somewhat faster than AQMS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AQMSCLH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AQMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STBFF31.52N/A
N/A
Suntory Beverage & Food Ltd
CHFFF0.47N/A
N/A
China Everbright Environment Group Ltd.
KGAUF0.16N/A
N/A
Kongsberg Automotive ASA
NSARP68.83-1.17
-1.67%
NSTAR Electric Co.
HLYK0.03N/A
-5.96%
HealthLynked Corp.

AQMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AQMS and LNZA have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AQMS and LNZA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AQMS
1D Price
Change %
AQMS100%
-5.45%
LNZA - AQMS
18%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
CLH - AQMS
17%
Poorly correlated
+1.65%
GWAV - AQMS
15%
Poorly correlated
+5.49%
QRHC - AQMS
10%
Poorly correlated
+3.74%
WCN - AQMS
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.48%
More

CLH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLH has been loosely correlated with NVRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLH jumps, then NVRI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLH
1D Price
Change %
CLH100%
+1.65%
NVRI - CLH
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
WCN - CLH
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.48%
WM - CLH
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.66%
CWST - CLH
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.62%
RSG - CLH
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.45%
More