Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AQLGX vs CGFAX
AQLGX vs CGFAX Comparison
Open Charts AQLGX vs CGFAX
Alta Quality Growth Institutional
Price$18.14
Change+$0.09 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.06M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$86.28
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
AQLGX vs CGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AQLGX vs. CGFAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AQLGX is a Buy and CGFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. AQLGX (53.1M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than AQLGX: CGFAX (0.31) vs AQLGX (0.02). AQLGX was incepted earlier than CGFAX: AQLGX (7 years) vs CGFAX (24 years). AQLGX (1.15) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). AQLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AQLGX: CGFAX (250) vs AQLGX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. AQLGX (-0.69). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.47 vs. AQLGX (27.21).
| AQLGX | CGFAX | AQLGX / CGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.65 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.65 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.558 | 17.933 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1M | 337B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.31 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.69 | 11.47 | -6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.14 | 72.49 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.21 | 40.47 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 106.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement