APRAF
Price
$0.20
Change
-$0.01 (-4.76%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
8.29M
MGMLF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
24.9M
Interact to see
Advertisement

APRAF vs MGMLF

Header iconAPRAF vs MGMLF Comparison
Open Charts APRAF vs MGMLFBanner chart's image
Trailbreaker Resources
Price$0.20
Change-$0.01 (-4.76%)
Volume$15.75K
Capitalization8.29M
Maple Gold Mines
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$76.2K
Capitalization24.9M
APRAF vs MGMLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
APRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APRAF vs. MGMLF commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APRAF is a Hold and MGMLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (APRAF: $0.20 vs. MGMLF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: APRAF and MGMLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APRAF: 105% vs. MGMLF: 38%
Market capitalization -- APRAF: $8.29M vs. MGMLF: $24.9M
APRAF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $8.29M. MGMLF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $24.9M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $76.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APRAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMGMLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • APRAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MGMLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both APRAF and MGMLF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APRAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGMLF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APRAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MGMLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, APRAF is a better buy in the short-term than MGMLF.

Price Growth

APRAF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -14.23% price change this week, while MGMLF (@Precious Metals) price change was +5.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +19.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4669.58%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+19.60% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGMLF($24.9M) has a higher market cap than APRAF($8.29M). MGMLF YTD gains are higher at: 46.988 vs. APRAF (-6.125). APRAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -486.9K vs. MGMLF (-5.4M). MGMLF has more cash in the bank: 5.41M vs. APRAF (1.47M). APRAF (0) and MGMLF (0) have equivalent revenues.
APRAFMGMLFAPRAF / MGMLF
Capitalization8.29M24.9M33%
EBITDA-486.9K-5.4M9%
Gain YTD-6.12546.988-13%
P/E Ratio27.69N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.47M5.41M27%
Total DebtN/A263K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APRAF vs MGMLF: Fundamental Ratings
APRAF
MGMLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
85100
SMR RATING
1..100
9199
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6461
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
86100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3790

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

APRAF's Valuation (72) in the null industry is in the same range as MGMLF (87). This means that APRAF’s stock grew similarly to MGMLF’s over the last 12 months.

APRAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as MGMLF (100). This means that APRAF’s stock grew similarly to MGMLF’s over the last 12 months.

APRAF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as MGMLF (99). This means that APRAF’s stock grew similarly to MGMLF’s over the last 12 months.

MGMLF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as APRAF (64). This means that MGMLF’s stock grew similarly to APRAF’s over the last 12 months.

APRAF's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as MGMLF (100). This means that APRAF’s stock grew similarly to MGMLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APRAFMGMLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
76%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSWC22.900.40
+1.78%
Capital Southwest Corp
PB66.060.66
+1.01%
Prosperity Bancshares
SHEL71.650.28
+0.39%
Shell plc
JUNS1.21-0.07
-5.47%
Jupiter Neurosciences Inc
LANV2.17-0.19
-8.05%
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited

APRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that APRAF and NSUPF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that APRAF and NSUPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APRAF
1D Price
Change %
APRAF100%
-4.52%
NSUPF - APRAF
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.37%
BYAGF - APRAF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
PMDRF - APRAF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNL - APRAF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.56%
HCHDF - APRAF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
More

MGMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGMLF and KLKLF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGMLF and KLKLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGMLF
1D Price
Change %
MGMLF100%
+7.44%
KLKLF - MGMLF
26%
Poorly correlated
+10.00%
GGLDF - MGMLF
24%
Poorly correlated
-5.14%
APRAF - MGMLF
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.52%
TSGZF - MGMLF
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.85%
WRLGF - MGMLF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.95%
More