It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APPN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFRSH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APPN’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRSH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
APPN (@Packaged Software) experienced а -1.24% price change this week, while FRSH (@Packaged Software) price change was +2.32% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.19%.
APPN is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.
FRSH is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
APPN | FRSH | APPN / FRSH | |
Capitalization | 2.78B | 5.43B | 51% |
EBITDA | -80.9M | -158.03M | 51% |
Gain YTD | -0.531 | -28.523 | 2% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 1.54 | - |
Revenue | 545M | 596M | 91% |
Total Cash | 159M | 1.19B | 13% |
Total Debt | 277M | 29.5M | 939% |
APPN | FRSH | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | 53 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 67 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 25 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FRSH's Valuation (53) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as APPN (68) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to APPN’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APPN (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew somewhat faster than APPN’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's SMR Rating (94) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as APPN (98) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to APPN’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as APPN (45) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to APPN’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for APPN (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew significantly faster than APPN’s over the last 12 months.
APPN | FRSH | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 1 day ago69% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 1 day ago84% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago84% | 1 day ago85% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% | 1 day ago73% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% | 1 day ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 10 days ago70% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago84% | 6 days ago80% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago75% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APPN has been loosely correlated with PEGA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if APPN jumps, then PEGA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To APPN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
APPN | 100% | +0.46% | ||
PEGA - APPN | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.57% | ||
INTU - APPN | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.93% | ||
ONTF - APPN | 48% Loosely correlated | -3.75% | ||
WK - APPN | 47% Loosely correlated | +3.67% | ||
BAND - APPN | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.94% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRSH has been loosely correlated with FSLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRSH jumps, then FSLY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FRSH | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FRSH | 100% | -1.35% | ||
FSLY - FRSH | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.61% | ||
HUBS - FRSH | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
APPN - FRSH | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.46% | ||
BIGC - FRSH | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.58% | ||
WEAV - FRSH | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
More |