It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCRWRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APPF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CRWRF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
APPF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -5.88% price change this week, while CRWRF (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.79%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.83%.
APPF is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Services to the Health Industry (+1.49% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
APPF | CRWRF | APPF / CRWRF | |
Capitalization | 10.2B | 1.12B | 907% |
EBITDA | 162M | 57.6M | 281% |
Gain YTD | 21.745 | 16.547 | 131% |
P/E Ratio | 51.15 | 76.24 | 67% |
Revenue | 863M | 198M | 436% |
Total Cash | 128M | 72.2M | 177% |
Total Debt | 39.6M | 35.9M | 110% |
APPF | CRWRF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 78 Overvalued | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 30 | 64 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 19 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 87 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 20 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
APPF's Valuation (78) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CRWRF (82) in the null industry. This means that APPF’s stock grew similarly to CRWRF’s over the last 12 months.
APPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRWRF (64) in the null industry. This means that APPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRWRF’s over the last 12 months.
APPF's SMR Rating (19) in the Information Technology Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for CRWRF (86) in the null industry. This means that APPF’s stock grew significantly faster than CRWRF’s over the last 12 months.
APPF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CRWRF (42) in the null industry. This means that APPF’s stock grew similarly to CRWRF’s over the last 12 months.
APPF's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CRWRF (87) in the null industry. This means that APPF’s stock grew similarly to CRWRF’s over the last 12 months.
APPF | CRWRF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago81% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago71% | 4 days ago21% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago29% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago20% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago68% | 4 days ago26% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago69% | 4 days ago25% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago76% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago67% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago73% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago58% | 4 days ago28% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
XBOC | 32.32 | 0.08 | +0.25% |
Innovator US Eq Acclrtd 9 Bffr ETF™ Oct | |||
TPLC | 44.99 | 0.03 | +0.07% |
Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF | |||
TRSY | 30.09 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
Xtrackers US 0-1 Year Treasury ETF | |||
ZROZ | 65.52 | -0.34 | -0.52% |
PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Trs ETF | |||
BERZ | 4.80 | -0.21 | -4.19% |
MicroSectors™ St FANG&Inn 3X Inv Ld ETNs |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APPF has been loosely correlated with WK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if APPF jumps, then WK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To APPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
APPF | 100% | N/A | ||
WK - APPF | 47% Loosely correlated | -3.13% | ||
SSNC - APPF | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
RPD - APPF | 39% Loosely correlated | -9.81% | ||
SNPS - APPF | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
ADSK - APPF | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.79% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRWRF has been loosely correlated with SFSVF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRWRF jumps, then SFSVF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRWRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CRWRF | 100% | N/A | ||
SFSVF - CRWRF | 58% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
APPF - CRWRF | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
TXG - CRWRF | 25% Poorly correlated | -3.98% | ||
ONMD - CRWRF | 22% Poorly correlated | -5.35% | ||
AELTF - CRWRF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |