It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
APP (@Advertising/Marketing Services) experienced а +20.26% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was -9.79% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Advertising/Marketing Services industry was -2.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.46%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.79%.
APP is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
Making a brand known to people, garnering more clients/consumers for its product and solidifying the brand’s position in an industry – all of these are essential to a company’s growth, and that’s where marketing/advertising come in as one of the key catalysts. Advertising industry is a global multibillion-dollar business of public relations and marketing companies, media services and advertising agencies – entities that help to connect manufacturers/producers with customers. Digital media has played a big role in the growth of global advertising, and agencies invest substantially to integrate advanced technologies into their business operations. According to some estimates, the U.S. advertising industry is expected to generate revenue of $52.6 billion by 2023, up from almost $40 billion in 2015 . Omnicom Group Inc., Trade Desk, Inc. and Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. are some of the major U.S. companies in the industry.
@Packaged Software (-1.63% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
APP | HUBS | APP / HUBS | |
Capitalization | 154B | 23.7B | 650% |
EBITDA | 2.64B | 119M | 2,218% |
Gain YTD | 40.808 | -35.456 | -115% |
P/E Ratio | 62.63 | 7023.44 | 1% |
Revenue | 5.14B | 2.72B | 189% |
Total Cash | 551M | 2.04B | 27% |
Total Debt | 3.71B | 655M | 566% |
HUBS | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 69 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 45 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
APP | HUBS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago69% | 4 days ago80% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago76% | 4 days ago85% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% | 4 days ago64% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago89% | 4 days ago79% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago87% | 4 days ago68% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% | 4 days ago74% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago87% | 20 days ago80% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago68% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago71% | 4 days ago81% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% | 4 days ago73% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
CRYPTO / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
LQTY.X | 1.049897 | -0.011324 | -1.07% |
Liquity cryptocurrency | |||
TWT.X | 0.788607 | -0.015799 | -1.96% |
Trust Wallet Token cryptocurrency | |||
DOGE.X | 0.234099 | -0.006226 | -2.59% |
Dogecoin cryptocurrency | |||
VIC.X | 0.280066 | -0.007440 | -2.59% |
Viction cryptocurrency | |||
KEY.X | 0.000414 | -0.000030 | -6.71% |
SelfKey cryptocurrency |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APP has been loosely correlated with QTWO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if APP jumps, then QTWO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To APP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
APP | 100% | +4.26% | ||
QTWO - APP | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.33% | ||
CYBR - APP | 53% Loosely correlated | -3.31% | ||
HUBS - APP | 51% Loosely correlated | -2.63% | ||
CRWD - APP | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
FRSH - APP | 49% Loosely correlated | -2.47% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HUBS | 100% | -2.63% | ||
CRM - HUBS | 73% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
TEAM - HUBS | 68% Closely correlated | -1.72% | ||
NOW - HUBS | 68% Closely correlated | -0.18% | ||
S - HUBS | 67% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
CRWD - HUBS | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
More |