APO
Price
$139.39
Change
-$1.29 (-0.92%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
79.73B
73 days until earnings call
PWM
Price
$0.38
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
12.02M
Interact to see
Advertisement

APO vs PWM

Header iconAPO vs PWM Comparison
Open Charts APO vs PWMBanner chart's image
Apollo Global Management
Price$139.39
Change-$1.29 (-0.92%)
Volume$3.16M
Capitalization79.73B
Prestige Wealth
Price$0.38
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$65.92K
Capitalization12.02M
APO vs PWM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
APO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APO vs. PWM commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APO is a Hold and PWM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (APO: $139.39 vs. PWM: $0.38)
Brand notoriety: APO and PWM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APO: 105% vs. PWM: 2%
Market capitalization -- APO: $79.73B vs. PWM: $12.02M
APO [@Investment Managers] is valued at $79.73B. PWM’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $12.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $175.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePWM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • APO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PWM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, APO is a better buy in the long-term than PWM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PWM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, APO is a better buy in the short-term than PWM.

Price Growth

APO (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.82% price change this week, while PWM (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

APO is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.77% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
APO($79.7B) has a higher market cap than PWM($12M). APO YTD gains are higher at: -15.062 vs. PWM (-70.769).
APOPWMAPO / PWM
Capitalization79.7B12M664,167%
EBITDA7.92BN/A-
Gain YTD-15.062-70.76921%
P/E Ratio26.01N/A-
Revenue24.6BN/A-
Total Cash216BN/A-
Total Debt10.6BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APO: Fundamental Ratings
APO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
70
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
34
SMR RATING
1..100
54
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APOPWM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PID21.150.07
+0.33%
Invesco International Div Achiev ETF
HISF44.79-0.04
-0.09%
First Trust High Income Strat Foc ETF
FXZ59.33-0.21
-0.35%
First Trust Materials AlphaDEX® ETF
BNDX49.14-0.18
-0.36%
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
ZAP28.09-0.18
-0.64%
Global X U.S. Electrification ETF

APO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APO has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APO jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APO
1D Price
Change %
APO100%
-0.92%
KKR - APO
87%
Closely correlated
-2.59%
OWL - APO
84%
Closely correlated
-3.15%
ARES - APO
83%
Closely correlated
-1.40%
CG - APO
82%
Closely correlated
-1.62%
TPG - APO
80%
Closely correlated
-1.08%
More

PWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PWM and MSIF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PWM and MSIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PWM
1D Price
Change %
PWM100%
+1.33%
MSIF - PWM
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.32%
AMTD - PWM
20%
Poorly correlated
+13.53%
MAAS - PWM
13%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
BX - PWM
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.75%
APO - PWM
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.92%
More