APO
Price
$142.92
Change
+$3.57 (+2.56%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
63.9B
37 days until earnings call
OWL
Price
$19.45
Change
+$0.26 (+1.35%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
8.65B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

APO vs OWL

Header iconAPO vs OWL Comparison
Open Charts APO vs OWLBanner chart's image
Apollo Global Management
Price$142.92
Change+$3.57 (+2.56%)
Volume$8.39M
Capitalization63.9B
Blue Owl Capital
Price$19.45
Change+$0.26 (+1.35%)
Volume$14.79M
Capitalization8.65B
APO vs OWL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
APO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APO vs. OWL commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APO is a Buy and OWL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (APO: $142.92 vs. OWL: $19.45)
Brand notoriety: APO and OWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APO: 259% vs. OWL: 196%
Market capitalization -- APO: $63.9B vs. OWL: $8.65B
APO [@Investment Managers] is valued at $63.9B. OWL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $8.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOWL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • APO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, APO is a better buy in the long-term than OWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OWL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • OWL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, APO is a better buy in the short-term than OWL.

Price Growth

APO (@Investment Managers) experienced а +6.24% price change this week, while OWL (@Investment Managers) price change was +3.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

APO is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

OWL is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.85% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
APO($63.9B) has a higher market cap than OWL($8.65B). OWL has higher P/E ratio than APO: OWL (185.70) vs APO (13.58). APO YTD gains are higher at: -12.911 vs. OWL (-14.792). APO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.65B vs. OWL (633M). APO has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. OWL (104M). OWL has less debt than APO: OWL (2B) vs APO (8.09B). APO has higher revenues than OWL: APO (32.6B) vs OWL (1.73B).
APOOWLAPO / OWL
Capitalization63.9B8.65B739%
EBITDA6.65B633M1,050%
Gain YTD-12.911-14.79287%
P/E Ratio13.58185.707%
Revenue32.6B1.73B1,882%
Total Cash170B104M163,462%
Total Debt8.09B2B404%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APO: Fundamental Ratings
APO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
17
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
29
SMR RATING
1..100
54
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APOOWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AIO24.770.58
+2.40%
Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund
IVE194.350.83
+0.43%
iShares S&P 500 Value ETF
FSYD47.680.05
+0.11%
Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF
DAGXF2.25N/A
N/A
Deutsche Bank AG (London Branch)
BUFB33.54N/A
N/A
Innovator Laddered Allocation Buffer ETF

APO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APO has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APO jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APO
1D Price
Change %
APO100%
+2.56%
KKR - APO
87%
Closely correlated
+1.78%
OWL - APO
84%
Closely correlated
+1.35%
ARES - APO
83%
Closely correlated
+1.21%
TPG - APO
82%
Closely correlated
+0.51%
CG - APO
81%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
More

OWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OWL has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OWL jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OWL
1D Price
Change %
OWL100%
+1.35%
ARES - OWL
86%
Closely correlated
+1.21%
KKR - OWL
85%
Closely correlated
+1.78%
APO - OWL
84%
Closely correlated
+2.56%
CG - OWL
82%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
TPG - OWL
81%
Closely correlated
+0.51%
More