APO
Price
$133.44
Change
+$0.12 (+0.09%)
Updated
Apr 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
63.9B
5 days until earnings call
OWL
Price
$18.50
Change
+$0.03 (+0.16%)
Updated
Apr 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.65B
4 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

APO vs OWL

Header iconAPO vs OWL Comparison
Open Charts APO vs OWLBanner chart's image
Apollo Global Management
Price$133.44
Change+$0.12 (+0.09%)
Volume$13.71K
Capitalization63.9B
Blue Owl Capital
Price$18.50
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
Volume$33.03K
Capitalization8.65B
APO vs OWL Comparison Chart
Loading...
APO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APO vs. OWL commentary
Apr 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APO is a Buy and OWL is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 28, 2025
Stock price -- (APO: $133.32 vs. OWL: $18.47)
Brand notoriety: APO and OWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APO: 59% vs. OWL: 101%
Market capitalization -- APO: $63.9B vs. OWL: $8.65B
APO [@Investment Managers] is valued at $63.9B. OWL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $8.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APO’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileOWL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • APO’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • OWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, APO is a better buy in the long-term than OWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OWL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OWL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OWL is a better buy in the short-term than APO.

Price Growth

APO (@Investment Managers) experienced а +5.16% price change this week, while OWL (@Investment Managers) price change was +6.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

APO is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

OWL is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.57% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
APO($63.9B) has a higher market cap than OWL($8.65B). OWL has higher P/E ratio than APO: OWL (185.70) vs APO (13.58). APO (-19.048) and OWL (-19.997) have similar YTD gains . APO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.65B vs. OWL (633M). APO has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. OWL (104M). OWL has less debt than APO: OWL (2B) vs APO (8.09B). APO has higher revenues than OWL: APO (32.6B) vs OWL (1.73B).
APOOWLAPO / OWL
Capitalization63.9B8.65B739%
EBITDA6.65B633M1,050%
Gain YTD-19.048-19.99795%
P/E Ratio13.58185.707%
Revenue32.6B1.73B1,882%
Total Cash170B104M163,462%
Total Debt8.09B2B404%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APO: Fundamental Ratings
APO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
27
SMR RATING
1..100
41
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
20
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APOOWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
APO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA259.518.77
+3.50%
Tesla
SPY546.6911.27
+2.10%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL208.373.77
+1.84%
Apple
BTC.X93943.800000244.687500
+0.26%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME27.08-0.04
-0.15%
GameStop Corp

APO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APO has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APO jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APO
1D Price
Change %
APO100%
+5.35%
ARES - APO
83%
Closely correlated
+4.81%
OWL - APO
81%
Closely correlated
+4.53%
KKR - APO
81%
Closely correlated
+6.03%
TPG - APO
79%
Closely correlated
+4.92%
CG - APO
78%
Closely correlated
+6.01%
More

OWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OWL has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OWL jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OWL
1D Price
Change %
OWL100%
+4.53%
ARES - OWL
83%
Closely correlated
+4.81%
KKR - OWL
81%
Closely correlated
+6.03%
APO - OWL
81%
Closely correlated
+5.35%
TPG - OWL
78%
Closely correlated
+4.92%
CG - OWL
78%
Closely correlated
+6.01%
More