APO
Price
$171.03
Change
+$1.40 (+0.83%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
45 days until earnings call
OWL
Price
$23.49
Change
+$0.39 (+1.69%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
51 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

APO vs OWL

Header iconAPO vs OWL Comparison
Open Charts APO vs OWLBanner chart's image
Apollo Global Management
Price$171.03
Change+$1.40 (+0.83%)
Volume$91.31M
CapitalizationN/A
Blue Owl Capital
Price$23.49
Change+$0.39 (+1.69%)
Volume$8.6M
CapitalizationN/A
APO vs OWL Comparison Chart
Loading...
APO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APO vs. OWL commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APO is a Hold and OWL is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (APO: $171.03 vs. OWL: $23.49)
Brand notoriety: APO and OWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APO: 1502% vs. OWL: 123%
Market capitalization -- APO: $63.9B vs. OWL: $8.65B
APO [@Investment Managers] is valued at $63.9B. OWL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $8.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APO’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileOWL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • APO’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • OWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, APO is a better buy in the long-term than OWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OWL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OWL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, APO is a better buy in the short-term than OWL.

Price Growth

APO (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.06% price change this week, while OWL (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

APO is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

OWL is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
APO($63.9B) has a higher market cap than OWL($8.65B). OWL has higher P/E ratio than APO: OWL (185.70) vs APO (13.58). APO YTD gains are higher at: 86.266 vs. OWL (63.363). APO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.65B vs. OWL (633M). APO has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. OWL (104M). OWL has less debt than APO: OWL (2B) vs APO (8.09B). APO has higher revenues than OWL: APO (32.6B) vs OWL (1.73B).
APOOWLAPO / OWL
Capitalization63.9B8.65B739%
EBITDA6.65B633M1,050%
Gain YTD86.26663.363136%
P/E Ratio13.58185.707%
Revenue32.6B1.73B1,882%
Total Cash170B104M163,462%
Total Debt8.09B2B404%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APO: Fundamental Ratings
APO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
39
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3
SMR RATING
1..100
18
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APOOWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
APO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X95104.940000-2119.789000
-2.18%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

APO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APO has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APO jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APO
1D Price
Change %
APO100%
+0.83%
KKR - APO
76%
Closely correlated
+2.82%
ARES - APO
71%
Closely correlated
+2.90%
OWL - APO
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.69%
TPG - APO
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.31%
CG - APO
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.43%
More

OWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OWL has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OWL jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OWL
1D Price
Change %
OWL100%
+1.69%
ARES - OWL
68%
Closely correlated
+2.90%
APO - OWL
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
TPG - OWL
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.31%
KKR - OWL
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.82%
CG - OWL
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.43%
More