APO
Price
$131.55
Change
-$3.21 (-2.38%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
75.25B
53 days until earnings call
IVZ
Price
$21.99
Change
+$0.03 (+0.14%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
9.81B
51 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

APO vs IVZ

Header iconAPO vs IVZ Comparison
Open Charts APO vs IVZBanner chart's image
Apollo Global Management
Price$131.55
Change-$3.21 (-2.38%)
Volume$4.52M
Capitalization75.25B
Inves
Price$21.99
Change+$0.03 (+0.14%)
Volume$2.83M
Capitalization9.81B
APO vs IVZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
APO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IVZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APO vs. IVZ commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APO is a Hold and IVZ is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (APO: $131.55 vs. IVZ: $21.99)
Brand notoriety: APO and IVZ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APO: 149% vs. IVZ: 49%
Market capitalization -- APO: $75.25B vs. IVZ: $9.81B
APO [@Investment Managers] is valued at $75.25B. IVZ’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $9.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIVZ’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • APO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • IVZ’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, IVZ is a better buy in the long-term than APO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IVZ’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • IVZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IVZ is a better buy in the short-term than APO.

Price Growth

APO (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.44% price change this week, while IVZ (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

APO is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

IVZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
APO($75.3B) has a higher market cap than IVZ($9.81B). APO (24.54) and IVZ (23.65) have similar P/E ratio . IVZ YTD gains are higher at: 30.218 vs. APO (-19.545). IVZ has less debt than APO: IVZ (1.88B) vs APO (10.6B).
APOIVZAPO / IVZ
Capitalization75.3B9.81B768%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-19.54530.218-65%
P/E Ratio24.5423.65104%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt10.6B1.88B563%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APO vs IVZ: Fundamental Ratings
APO
IVZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
649
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3643
SMR RATING
1..100
5487
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
574
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
917
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IVZ's Valuation (19) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as APO (27). This means that IVZ’s stock grew similarly to APO’s over the last 12 months.

APO's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as IVZ (43). This means that APO’s stock grew similarly to IVZ’s over the last 12 months.

APO's SMR Rating (54) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IVZ (87). This means that APO’s stock grew somewhat faster than IVZ’s over the last 12 months.

IVZ's Price Growth Rating (4) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APO (57). This means that IVZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than APO’s over the last 12 months.

APO's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as IVZ (17). This means that APO’s stock grew similarly to IVZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APOIVZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IVZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GENM10.270.05
+0.47%
Genter Capital Municipal Qual Interm ETF
XFEB34.66-0.01
-0.04%
FT Vest US Eq Enh & Mod Buf ETF-Feb
SCHG30.80-0.03
-0.10%
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
AAPU29.17-0.05
-0.17%
Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 2X Shares
KIE58.86-0.66
-1.11%
SPDR® S&P Insurance ETF

APO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APO has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APO jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APO
1D Price
Change %
APO100%
-2.38%
KKR - APO
86%
Closely correlated
-1.33%
OWL - APO
84%
Closely correlated
-1.44%
ARES - APO
82%
Closely correlated
-1.52%
CG - APO
82%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
TPG - APO
80%
Closely correlated
-0.85%
More

IVZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVZ has been closely correlated with CG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IVZ jumps, then CG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IVZ
1D Price
Change %
IVZ100%
+0.14%
CG - IVZ
74%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
STEP - IVZ
69%
Closely correlated
-1.22%
TPG - IVZ
68%
Closely correlated
-0.85%
APO - IVZ
67%
Closely correlated
-2.38%
OWL - IVZ
66%
Closely correlated
-1.44%
More