APO
Price
$134.44
Change
+$2.89 (+2.20%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
75.25B
51 days until earnings call
IGIFF
Price
$36.13
Change
+$0.82 (+2.32%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
8.53B
Interact to see
Advertisement

APO vs IGIFF

Header iconAPO vs IGIFF Comparison
Open Charts APO vs IGIFFBanner chart's image
Apollo Global Management
Price$134.44
Change+$2.89 (+2.20%)
Volume$16.8K
Capitalization75.25B
IGM Financial
Price$36.13
Change+$0.82 (+2.32%)
Volume$815
Capitalization8.53B
APO vs IGIFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
APO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IGIFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APO vs. IGIFF commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APO is a Buy and IGIFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (APO: $131.55 vs. IGIFF: $36.13)
Brand notoriety: APO and IGIFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APO: 149% vs. IGIFF: 35%
Market capitalization -- APO: $75.25B vs. IGIFF: $8.53B
APO [@Investment Managers] is valued at $75.25B. IGIFF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $8.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIGIFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • APO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • IGIFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both APO and IGIFF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IGIFF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • IGIFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, APO is a better buy in the short-term than IGIFF.

Price Growth

APO (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.44% price change this week, while IGIFF (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

APO is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.12% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
APO($75.3B) has a higher market cap than IGIFF($8.53B). APO has higher P/E ratio than IGIFF: APO (24.54) vs IGIFF (12.15). IGIFF YTD gains are higher at: 13.032 vs. APO (-19.545). IGIFF has less debt than APO: IGIFF (7.52B) vs APO (10.6B).
APOIGIFFAPO / IGIFF
Capitalization75.3B8.53B883%
EBITDAN/A1.39B-
Gain YTD-19.54513.032-150%
P/E Ratio24.5412.15202%
RevenueN/A3.63B-
Total CashN/A2.44B-
Total Debt10.6B7.52B141%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APO vs IGIFF: Fundamental Ratings
APO
IGIFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3661
SMR RATING
1..100
5461
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6046
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
936
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IGIFF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as APO (27) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that IGIFF’s stock grew similarly to APO’s over the last 12 months.

APO's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as IGIFF (61) in the null industry. This means that APO’s stock grew similarly to IGIFF’s over the last 12 months.

APO's SMR Rating (54) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as IGIFF (61) in the null industry. This means that APO’s stock grew similarly to IGIFF’s over the last 12 months.

IGIFF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as APO (60) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that IGIFF’s stock grew similarly to APO’s over the last 12 months.

APO's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as IGIFF (36) in the null industry. This means that APO’s stock grew similarly to IGIFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APOIGIFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IGIFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KEMQ24.000.39
+1.66%
KraneShares Em Mkts Cnsmr Tech ETF
TPIF33.080.13
+0.39%
Timothy Plan International ETF
EZU59.650.17
+0.29%
iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF
ONEV134.320.32
+0.24%
SPDR® Russell 1000 Low Vol Foc ETF
LGDX21.99-0.04
-0.19%
Intech S&P Large Cap Diversified Alpha ETF

APO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APO has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APO jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APO
1D Price
Change %
APO100%
-2.38%
KKR - APO
86%
Closely correlated
-1.33%
OWL - APO
85%
Closely correlated
-1.44%
ARES - APO
82%
Closely correlated
-1.52%
CG - APO
82%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
TPG - APO
80%
Closely correlated
-0.85%
More

IGIFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IGIFF and CIXXF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IGIFF and CIXXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IGIFF
1D Price
Change %
IGIFF100%
N/A
CIXXF - IGIFF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNCSF - IGIFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
HALFF - IGIFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
JBAXY - IGIFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
APO - IGIFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.38%
More